Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add EventsPerLumi for relvals workflows and prod-like concurrentLS relvals #29318

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 6, 2020

Conversation

srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

@srimanob srimanob commented Mar 27, 2020

PR description:

This PR is to add an option to set EventsPerLumi in relvals. Normally, GEN relvals will set EventsPerLumi = EventsPerJobs. Setting can be done in 2 ways:

  1. propagate from process.source.numberEventsInLuminosityBlock in relvals workflow, or
  2. parameter of runTheMatrix, runTheMatrix.py --numberEventsInLuminosityBlock (overwrite "1." if both options exist)

In addition, 2 additional relvals (1302.181 and 1304.181) are added. They are prod-like 2018 production with concurrentLumis enable.

RelVals: Link

  • srimanob_RVCMSSW_11_1_0_pre4ProdTTbar_13UP18ml__ml_PHATTEST_200326_215358_6428 (concurrentLumis enable with new EventsPerLumi setting )
  • srimanob_RVCMSSW_11_1_0_pre4ProdTTbar_13UP18__ml_PHATTEST_200326_215402_5324 (normal relvals workflows, with new EventsPerLumi setting )

PR validation:

runTheMatrix.py --what standard -l 1302.18,1304.18,1302.181,1304.181 -t 4 --wm init
==> only concurrentLumis workflows have EventsPerLumi = 5 (as set in cmsDriver)

runTheMatrix.py --what standard -l 1302.18,1304.18,1302.181,1304.181 --numberEventsInLuminosityBlock 20 -t 4 --wm init
==> All workflows have EventsPerLumi = 20

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29318/14396

  • This PR adds an extra 64KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @srimanob (Phat Srimanobhas) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@chayanit, @cmsbuild, @wajidalikhan, @pgunnell, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor Author

srimanob commented Mar 27, 2020

@makortel @Dr15Jones @silviodonato @fabiocos @chayanit
Do you think it's useful if we try to cross LS in every GEN-related relvals, not only in IB? I don't see the cons yet.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

Doing more comprehensive testing of jobs with multiple LuminosityBlocks makes sense to me. The down side, is without concurrent lumis (and even with but with module's that inhibit efficient use of concurrent lumis) the multi-thread efficiency of the jobs will descrease. Say we use 4 threads and 5 events per lumi. So on average each thread only processes 1 event and then has to wait for all other threads to finish (because of synchronization on the lumi boundary).

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @Dr15Jones
Thanks for the comment. Normally, relvals run 50 events per job, we do like 10 events/lumi or 25/lumi by default. For IB, it will pick up from cmsDriver directly, 5 events/lumi.

@chayanit
Copy link

please test workflow 1302.18,1304.18,1302.181,1304.181

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 30, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Test Parameters:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 450129a
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0d74d4/5438/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-03-30-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0d74d4/5438/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-0d74d4/1302.181_ProdTTbar_13UP18ml+ProdTTbar_13UP18ml+DIGIUP18PROD1ml+RECOPRODUP18ml+MINIAODMCUP18ml+NANOPRODUP18ml
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-0d74d4/1302.18_ProdTTbar_13UP18+ProdTTbar_13UP18+DIGIUP18PROD1+RECOPRODUP18+MINIAODMCUP18+NANOPRODUP18
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-0d74d4/1304.181_ProdZEE_13UP18ml+ProdZEE_13UP18ml+DIGIUP18PROD1ml+RECOPRODUP18ml+MINIAODMCUP18ml+NANOPRODUP18ml

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2692110
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 36
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2691755
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

kpedro88 commented Apr 2, 2020

test parameters
workflows = 1302.18,1304.18,1302.181,1304.181

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

kpedro88 commented Apr 2, 2020

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 2, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Test Parameters:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 2, 2020

+1
Tested at: 19d83f4
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0d74d4/5506/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-04-02-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 2, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 2, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0d74d4/5506/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-0d74d4/1302.181_ProdTTbar_13UP18ml+ProdTTbar_13UP18ml+DIGIUP18PROD1ml+RECOPRODUP18ml+MINIAODMCUP18ml+NANOPRODUP18ml
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-0d74d4/1302.18_ProdTTbar_13UP18+ProdTTbar_13UP18+DIGIUP18PROD1+RECOPRODUP18+MINIAODMCUP18+NANOPRODUP18
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-0d74d4/1304.181_ProdZEE_13UP18ml+ProdZEE_13UP18ml+DIGIUP18PROD1ml+RECOPRODUP18ml+MINIAODMCUP18ml+NANOPRODUP18ml

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2692110
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 38
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2691753
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

kpedro88 commented Apr 3, 2020

+upgrade

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

Do you have comments @chayanit @pgunnell @wajidalikhan ?

@chayanit
Copy link

chayanit commented Apr 6, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 6, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants