[11.1.X] Applied gain calibration scheme update at HLT as well

[mmusich]

backport of #29951

PR description:

Unfortunately the Pixel gain calibration scheme update introduced at #29333 missed the HLT configuration.
This PR provides the appropriate customization function to deal with the update of conditions also for the HLT.

PR validation:

Dumped the step3 configuration of https://cmsweb.cern.ch/couchdb/reqmgr_config_cache/95d680704ae17507a77b0e3350c8c1d5/configFile with and without this branch and obtained as expected:

$ colordiff dump.py dump2.py 
65455,65458c65455,65458
<     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(47),
<     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(50),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(-60),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(-670),
---
>     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(0),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(0),
65484,65487c65484,65487
<     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(47),
<     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(50),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(-60),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(-670),
---
>     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(0),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(0),
65513,65516c65513,65516
<     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(47),
<     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(50),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(-60),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(-670),
---
>     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(0),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(0),
65542,65545c65542,65545
<     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(47),
<     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(50),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(-60),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(-670),
---
>     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(0),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(0),

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Verbatim backport of #29951

cc: @tsusa @dkotlins @tvami

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_11_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

HLTrigger/Configuration

@cmsbuild, @Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from SiPixelClusterProducer: apply gain calibration scheme update at HLT as well #29951

[mmusich]

type bug-fix

[mmusich]

urgent

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/6525/console Started: 2020/05/22 21:20

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 1afecc5
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b7dbef/6525/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-05-22-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b7dbef/6525/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2780792
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13195
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2767547
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
• Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

[Martin-Grunewald]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_11_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[silviodonato]

+1