Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Online BeamSpot ESProducer for Run3 workflow #30965

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Aug 5, 2020

Conversation

gennai
Copy link
Contributor

@gennai gennai commented Jul 29, 2020

PR description:

This is a cleanup version of a past PR #30591, introducing a new ESProducer to make a beamspot transient record to replace the old way (Run3) to access beamspot position at HLT

PR validation:

I have run the RecoVertex/BeamSpotProducer/test/readOnlineBeamSpotFromDB.py to test the ESProducer is working as expected. Another producer and a Analyzer have been added for further checks and future developments.

A Backporting to 11_1_X for the next MWGR (September) will be needed

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30965/17399

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30965/17400

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @gennai (simone gennai) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CondFormats/DataRecord
RecoVertex/BeamSpotProducer

@perrotta, @slava77, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @jpata, @tlampen, @ggovi, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @tocheng, @VinInn, @ebrondol, @rovere, @mmusich, @mtosi, @dgulhan, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Jul 30, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 30, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: d093bd5
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d9101c/8418/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-07-29-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Aug 3, 2020

Thank you - from my side this should be approved today.

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Aug 3, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 3, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 3, 2020

+1
Tested at: 851cd62
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d9101c/8504/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-02-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 3, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 3, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d9101c/8504/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2525448
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2525400
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 47
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 144 log files, 17 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Aug 4, 2020

+1

  • tests pass with no difference, as expected
  • adds a new OnlineBeamSpotESProducer and OfflineToTransientBeamSpotESProducer, with a corresponding test analyzer
  • PR description is in line with the changes

@ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

ggovi commented Aug 4, 2020

+1

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

do you have any comments @cms-sw/alca-l2 ?

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

merge
@cms-sw/alca-l2 please have a look when you have time

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 78d9777 into cms-sw:master Aug 5, 2020
@tlampen
Copy link
Contributor

tlampen commented Aug 5, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants