Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix to enable hpsPFTauDiscriminationByDeadECALElectronRejection in run2 reminiAODs (10_6_X) #31044

Merged

Conversation

mbluj
Copy link
Contributor

@mbluj mbluj commented Aug 4, 2020

PR description:

Changes to fix the 10_6_X-related part of #31015 issue:

  • Move era-dependent modification of the anti-electron-in-deadECal tauID from miniAOD to the HPS PFTau master configuration;
  • Run such a modified tauID as part of the makePatTausTask within miniAOD sequence rather than its copy.

Introduced changes modify a bit logic of python configurations, but are expected to not change outputs.

PR validation:

Validated with configuration produced with the following cmsDriver command (with and without run2_miniAOD_devel era):

cmsDriver miniAOD2016 --filein /store/relval/CMSSW_10_6_12/RelValZTT_13UP16/AODSIM/PU25ns_106X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v13_hltul16_postVFP-v1/20000/157664D1-7172-C346-A158-010C1A5FEEFC.root file:MiniAOD2016.root --mc --eventcontent MINIAODSIM --runUnscheduled --datatier MINIAODSIM --conditions auto:run2_mc --step PAT --nThreads 4 --geometry DB:Extended --scenario pp --era Run2_2016,run2_miniAOD_devel -n -1 --no_exec

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @mbluj for CMSSW_10_6_X.

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoTauTag/Configuration

@perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @santocch, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @gouskos, @hatakeyamak, @emilbols, @peruzzim, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern, @ahinzmann, @smoortga, @jdolen, @ferencek, @jdamgov, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @schoef, @andrzejnovak, @clelange, @riga, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @mverzett, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 4, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2020

+1
Tested at: 1f08b68
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c72119/8549/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_10_6_X_2020-08-03-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc700

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c72119/8549/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3214618
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3214283
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 140 log files, 14 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@santocch
Copy link

santocch commented Aug 7, 2020

+1

Copy link
Contributor

@slava77 slava77 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a merge conflict in this PR, apparently after merging of #31072.
Now that #31072 is in, it is also more appropriate to use run2_miniAOD_UL for this PR .

RecoTauTag/Configuration/python/HPSPFTaus_cff.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 11, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 557f20e
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c72119/8707/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_10_6_X_2020-08-11-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc700

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c72119/8707/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3214618
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3214282
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 140 log files, 14 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 13, 2020

backport of #31047
... kind of

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 13, 2020

+1

for #31044 557f20e

  • code changes are in line with the PR description and the follow up review
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show no (relevant) differences

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 14, 2020

@silviodonato @qliphy
can this be merged soon, so that #31065 can follow separately?
otherwise, it may become more practical to "-1" here and advance to #31065 , which currently includes this PR as a multi-feature backport.

Please check.
Thank you.

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Aug 14, 2020

+1

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 14, 2020

+1

this will need an explicit "merge" message, since the analysis signature can be bypassed, at least in this case (previously signed)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

merge

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 1a3788c into cms-sw:CMSSW_10_6_X Aug 14, 2020
@santocch
Copy link

+1

1 similar comment
@santocch
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_6_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_2_X is complete. This pull request will be automatically merged.

@mbluj mbluj deleted the CMSSW_10_6_X_tau-pog_deadECAL-fix branch October 10, 2023 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants