Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix scram b code-checks warnings associated with FWCore #31396

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 9, 2020

Conversation

Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Mostly this was moving =delete methods to public section and removing unnecessary uses of std::move.

PR validation:

code compiles. Running scram b code-checks no longer gives any warning for FWCore/Framework or FWCore/Utilities.

Mostly this was moving `=delete` methods to public section and
removing unnecessary uses of `std::move`.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 8, 2020

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

~LuminosityBlockAuxiliary() {}
LuminosityBlockAuxiliary& operator=(LuminosityBlockAuxiliary&&) = default;
LuminosityBlockAuxiliary& operator=(LuminosityBlockAuxiliary const&) = default;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NOTE: this changed allowed a use of std::move to actually do something useful.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 8, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31396/18243

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 8, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/Provenance
FWCore/Framework
FWCore/Utilities

@makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @felicepantaleo, @rovere, @wddgit this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 8, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 8, 2020

+1
Tested at: 24df5ff
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-232898/9199/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-08-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 8, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 9, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-232898/9199/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2609667
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2609639
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10224.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

makortel commented Sep 9, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 9, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Sep 9, 2020

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants