New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DD4hep] Introduce DD4hep Era for Tracker #31517
[DD4hep] Introduce DD4hep Era for Tracker #31517
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31517/18483
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ianna (Ianna Osborne) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Geometry @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
@kpedro88 - please, review |
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ | |||
|
|||
#Tracker | |||
from RecoTracker.GeometryESProducer.TrackerRecoGeometryESProducer_cfi import * | |||
from Geometry.TrackerGeometryBuilder.trackerParameters_cff import * |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not an issue created by this PR - however having parallel cffs (with / without DD4hep) and a dd4hep era is a rather error prone situation.. What ensures that these do not get mixed up?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
agree. The dd4hep-specific configurations should go away as soon as all the sub detectors have era-enabled fragments.
+upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy - please, consider integration asap. @ghugo83's and @bsunanda's imminent PRs depend on this. |
+1 |
TrackerParameters
producer to allow its use in add4hep
EratrackerParameters
configuration. That allows us reusing the same RECO geometry configuration rather then its DD4hep duplicationdd4hep
Era for Trackerdd4hep
Eratest/python
directoryGeometry/TrackerGeometryBuilder
PR description:
PR validation:
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist: