New jet flavour definition: Pruned GenParticles update

[ferencek]

Minor update to the new jet flavour code that fixes the parton selection routines when pruned GenParticles are used instead of the full GenParticle collection. Does not change DataFormats and has no impact on the standard reconstruction.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ferencek (Dinko Ferencek) for CMSSW_7_1_X.

New jet flavour definition: Pruned GenParticles update

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/JetExamples
PhysicsTools/JetMCAlgos

@nclopezo, @vadler, @cmsbuild, @Degano, @monttj can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@pvmulder this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[monttj]

+1

On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 8:18 AM, cmsbuild notifications@github.com wrote:

A new Pull Request was created by @ferencek https://github.com/ferencek(Dinko Ferencek) for CMSSW_7_1_X.

New jet flavour definition: Pruned GenParticles update

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/JetExamples
PhysicsTools/JetMCAlgos

@nclopezo https://github.com/nclopezo, @vadlerhttps://github.com/vadler,
@cmsbuild https://github.com/cmsbuild, @deganohttps://github.com/degano,
@monttj https://github.com/monttj can you please review it and
eventually sign? Thanks.
@pvmulder https://github.com/pvmulder this is something you requested
to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line
of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line
of your reply.
@nclopezo https://github.com/nclopezo, @ktf https://github.com/ktfyou are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of
your comment.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/3228#issuecomment-39653886
.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?

[cmsbuild]

+1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3228/809/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3228/809/summary.html