New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduce extend flag in HGCal validation #32508
Conversation
informing @rovere @felicepantaleo |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32508/20443
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ebrondol (Erica Brondolin) for master. It involves the following packages: Validation/HGCalValidation @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@ebrondol can you please add Subsystem Name (HGCAL) into PR title? Thanks |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d25d5f/11753/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
extended
flag in order to reduce the number of plots produced automatically in the HGCal validation.--separate
option is included is 10269 for a total of ~500Mb. Here follow a more detail description on which category produced more plotsThis corresponds at about a 30% reduction.
PR validation: