New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
disable LumiProducer in reco sequences #33024
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33024/21313
|
A new Pull Request was created by @jpata (Joosep Pata) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/StandardSequences @silviodonato, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
assign reconstruction |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
RelVals-INPUT
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cmsbuild please test the necessary workflows succeeded and show that the LumiProducer was removed, but trying to get rid of the unrelated DAS failures |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6780aa/13188/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+reconstruction
|
+operations |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
It seems this is making the |
PR description:
Removes LumiProducer from reco sequences to move towards concurrent lumi processing from reco side.
Previous reco-related discussions are in #32518.
The comment that initiated this is here: #25090 (comment)
PR validation:
I'm running the following on cmsdev20:
runTheMatrix.py --command="--customise_commands=\"process.options.wantSummary=True\"" -j 12
I expect to find no references to lumiProducer in the logfile summaries.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
No backport is intended.