Phase2-gex64 Make a scenario with V14 version of HGCal and HFNose

[bsunanda]

PR description:

Make a scenario with V14 version of HGCal, T21 version of Tracker, M9 version of Muons, I13 version of MTD and HFNose

PR validation:

Use the runTheMatrix test workflow 37034.0

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33343/21919

• This PR adds an extra 48KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/Geometry/python/dict2026Geometry.py modified in PR(s): update the tracking material for Phase2 geometry D49 #30126
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): New_samples (TTbarLepton_14 and QQH1352T_14) added #33324, Squash all Patatrack developments on top of CMSSW_11_3_0_pre5 #27983, Patatrack integration - Pixel workflows (12/N) #31854

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Geometry
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation
Configuration/StandardSequences
Geometry/CMSCommonData
Geometry/ForwardCommonData

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @cvuosalo, @wajidalikhan, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @makortel, @franzoni, @silviodonato, @kpedro88, @srimanob, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@fabiocos, @vargasa, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @lecriste, @mtosi, @dgulhan, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-65981c/14027/summary.html
COMMIT: 7c8c578
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-04-06-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/33343/14027/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 37
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2640868
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2640845
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 36 files compared)
• Checked 155 log files, 37 edm output root files, 37 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[cvuosalo]

+1

[chayanit]

+1

[srimanob]

@mariadalfonso @bsunanda @chayanit
If basically, the central detector is the same between D76 and the new D82, except for the addition of HFNose, would it be better to move relvals to D82 instead? As central is the same, it should have no effect on the validation result so far.

[srimanob]

please test workflow 37034.0

[srimanob]

please abort

[srimanob]

@silviodonato @qliphy
I accidentally sign this PR. However, I would like to test with new workflow first. The fist test trigger does not include new geometry test. And I also have the comment for this PR.

[silviodonato]

@silviodonato @qliphy
I accidentally sign this PR. However, I would like to test with new workflow first. The fist test trigger does not include new geometry test. And I also have the comment for this PR.

I deleted your comment, and it seems to work

[srimanob]

@bsunanda
If this will replace the old HFNose D60, should it be replaced also in the short matrix?
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/scripts/runTheMatrix.py#L91

[srimanob]

please test workflow 37034.0

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-65981c/14087/summary.html
COMMIT: 7c8c578
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-04-07-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/33343/14087/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-65981c/37034.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D82+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2835 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2865506
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3703
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2861781
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 37 files compared)
• Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 37 workflows

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

The new D82 workflow runs fine. We can make another PR if we would like to change the short matrix to this one, instead of D60.

[silviodonato]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.