Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ECAL esConsumes migrations in EventFilter and RecoLocalCalo #34273

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jul 1, 2021

Conversation

thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

esConsumes migrations of remaining EventSetupRecord::get occurrences in EventFilter/EcalRawToDigi and RecoLocalCalo/EcalRecProducers.

PR validation:

Complies and passes 136.874.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34273/23573

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @thomreis (Thomas Reis) for master.

It involves the following packages:

EventFilter/EcalRawToDigi
RecoLocalCalo/EcalRecProducers

@perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rchatter, @argiro, @Martin-Grunewald, @apsallid, @thomreis, @simonepigazzini this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 28, 2021

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1cbc5d/16290/summary.html
COMMIT: 8460bfe
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-06-28-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/34273/16290/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2785711
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2785682
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 37 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@sroychow
Copy link
Contributor

@thomreis I have marked the google doc with this PR info. In future if you are migrating other modules, please update the doc.

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @sroychow I will update the doc for future migrations.

Comment on lines 209 to 211
recHitParametersHandle_ = setup.getHandle(tokenRecHitParameters_);

auto const& ADCToGeVConstantProduct = ADCToGeVConstantHandle_->getProduct(ctx.stream());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are the handles actually needed? It seems like their usefulness is only as a temporary to be immediately dereferenced.
getData here seems more appropriate.

   auto const& adcToGeVConstantProduct = setup.getData(tokenADCToGeVConstant_).getProduct(ctx.stream());

please check and cleanup.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only two of those are needed. I will replace the rest with getData().

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only two of those are needed. I will replace the rest with getData().

thank you.

the remaining two are used only locally and could as well be defined just in the ::acquire method itself.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34273/23615

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2021

Pull request #34273 was updated. @perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Jul 1, 2021

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1cbc5d/16368/summary.html
COMMIT: 2763d63
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-06-30-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/34273/16368/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2785711
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 12
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2785676
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 37 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jul 1, 2021

+reconstruction

for #34273 2763d63

  • code changes are in line with the PR description and (mostly) with the follow up review
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show no (relevant) differences

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2021

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Jul 1, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 9b8c5dc into cms-sw:master Jul 1, 2021
@thomreis thomreis deleted the ecal_esconsumes_migrations branch July 1, 2021 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants