New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DQM] Add dqmPerLSsaving modifier #34487
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34487/23952
|
A new Pull Request was created by @jfernan2 for master. It involves the following packages:
@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @silviodonato, @jfernan2, @qliphy, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
import FWCore.ParameterSet.Config as cms | ||
|
||
# This modifier sets the perLS saving in process.DQMStore.saveByLumi for nanoDQMIO | ||
perLSsaving = cms.Modifier() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about e.g. dqmPerLSSaving
to make it clear that the Modifier is related to DQM?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done, thanks for the suggestion!
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34487/23956 |
Pull request #34487 was updated. @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @silviodonato, @jfernan2, @qliphy, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelVals
RelVals-INPUT
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c4a8c6/16842/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
ES Good Channel Fraction ME was originally ON in perRun configuration
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34487/23991 |
Pull request #34487 was updated. @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @silviodonato, @jfernan2, @qliphy, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c4a8c6/16859/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
After the creation of pseudo data-Tier nanoDQMIO in:
#34220
and
#34301
It was suggested by @makortel (Thank you!!!) to use a Modifier instead ( #34301 (comment))
This PR introduces the dqmPerLSsaving Modifier and files which need to make use of it
So now in addition to
--customise_commands=process.DQMStore.saveByLumi = cms.untracked.bool(True)
one must set
--procModifiers=dqmPerLSsaving
at cmsDriver.py config
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/PerLsDQMIO#nanoDQMIO_data_Tier
No changes expected in this PR since perLSsaving reamins switched off by default.
PR validation:
Tested locally with wfs 1000.0,4.22,4.17,18.0,136.858,4.37,136.8862,136.727,136.7801 with an equivalent config to this:
cmsDriver.py step2 -s DQM--datatier DQMIO --eventcontent DQM --data --customise_commands="process.DQMStore.saveByLumi = cms.untracked.bool(True)" --procModifiers=dqmPerLSsaving