New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid rerunning particlelevel producer in NanoAOD #34590
Conversation
enable profiling |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34590/24146
|
A new Pull Request was created by @kdlong (Kenneth Long) for master. It involves the following packages:
@SiewYan, @gouskos, @mkirsano, @Saptaparna, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @fgolf, @alberto-sanchez, @agrohsje, @mariadalfonso can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c937f8/17150/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test workflow 546,547,548 (test nanoGEN) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c937f8/17159/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
|
+xpog significant change in speed #34590 (comment) w/o change in nano content |
+generators |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Previously Rivet particle level producer was run separately to build collections for different kinematic criteria needed in matching. Now just run once with loose cuts, then apply selections before matching and in the RivetTable. Also exploit the changes in #34575 to speed up by not running jet clustering. @mseidel42