New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ecal laser update: Changed a system("mv") by a rename() and removed second attempt to read matacq file to speed up the processing when the file is missing #34623
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34623/24208 ERROR: Build errors found during clang-tidy run.
|
I don't know why there are so many conflicts. The changes I want to commit are limited to files: M CalibCalorimetry/EcalLaserSorting/interface/WatcherStreamFileReader.h Here is the patch that needs to be applied.
|
-1 wrong target branch, or the topic branch incorrectly included a git merge of an IB on top of a reference |
Which target I should use? I need the code to be eventually included in future releases, but it is not critical from which release it is in. Philippe. |
if this is a new feature, then the master branch is good. |
I've expanded the title and removed the unnecessary commented-out lines. The remaining ones are useful and kept. on purpose. |
@cmsbuild , please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test_PixelBaryCentreTool had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a9d58b/17276/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+reconstruction
|
+alca |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1
|
PR description:
Sync with code used at P5
PR validation:
MWGR