Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct RegionalMuon (un)packer when running on EMTF data #34801

Merged

Conversation

dinyar
Copy link
Contributor

@dinyar dinyar commented Aug 5, 2021

PR description:

EMTF doesn't yet send displaced muon information, but unfortunately puts debug data in the fields foreseen for use by dXY and unconstrained pT. This leads to mismatches in the uGMT data-emulator DQM because we unpack these debug data, interpret them as dXY and unconstrained pT, and then proceed to run the emulator on these inputs. The emulator output therefore doesn't match the firmware output anymore as the firmware correctly ignores those data.
With this change we avoid unpacking those fields until the uGMT firmware version changes to indicate that we actually use them in the algorithm.

attn: @panoskatsoulis as the BMTF output (un)packer slightly changes too.

PR validation:

Ran scram b runtests && runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos successfully.

…placement info

EMTF doesn't yet send displaced muon information, but unfortunately sends debug data in the fields foreseen for use by dXY and pT unconstrained.
With this change we avoid unpacking those data until the uGMT firmare version changes to indicate that we actually use it in the algorithm.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34801/24525

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @dinyar (Dinyar Rabady) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • EventFilter/L1TRawToDigi (l1)
  • L1Trigger/L1TMuon (l1)

@cmsbuild, @rekovic, @cecilecaillol can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @thomreis this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Aug 7, 2021

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 7, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-437135/17628/summary.html
COMMIT: 84e957d
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-06-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/34801/17628/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2999410
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2999381
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@dinyar
Copy link
Contributor Author

dinyar commented Aug 7, 2021

Had a look at the DQM bin by bin comparisons and those don't show any relevant differences (as expected).

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Aug 10, 2021

@cms-sw/l1-l2 any comment?

@panoskatsoulis
Copy link
Contributor

hi all, @dinyar thx for the ping
the BMTF looks fine

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Aug 31, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test
(to refresh)

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 1, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-437135/18196/summary.html
COMMIT: 84e957d
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-31-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/34801/18196/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3000404
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3000382
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Sep 2, 2021

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants