Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HGCAL] Adding comments in HGCAL associators #35104

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Sep 7, 2021
Merged

Conversation

apsallid
Copy link
Contributor

@apsallid apsallid commented Sep 1, 2021

PR description:

This PR addresses the following issues:

  1. It includes some comments in HGCAL associators to make some complicated objects easier to understand.
  2. It removes the unused deprecated detIdInfoInMultiCluster struct.

PR validation:

Tested locally with workflow 34624.0. We expect no differences in any workflow.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

This is not a backport.

@rovere @felicepantaleo @lecriste @ebrondol

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 1, 2021

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35104/24993

  • This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 1, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35104/25000

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 1, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @apsallid for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • SimCalorimetry/HGCalAssociatorProducers (upgrade, simulation)

@cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @civanch, @srimanob, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rovere this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Sep 1, 2021

@cmsbuild please test

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

test parameters:

  • workflow=34624.0

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 1, 2021

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8b8ec3/18219/summary.html
COMMIT: 73dc6aa
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-31-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35104/18219/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Sep 2, 2021

Workflow 34624 is TTbar_13 TeV with D76. Testing with default short matrix 34634 (TTbar_14TeV) should be the same.

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Sep 2, 2021

test parameters:

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Sep 2, 2021

Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2021

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8b8ec3/18237/summary.html
COMMIT: 73dc6aa
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-01-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35104/18237/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals-INPUT

  • 136.72413136.72413_RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL+RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL+REMININANO_data2016UL_HIPM_met+HARVESTDR2_REMININANO_data2016UL_HIPM_met/step2_RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL+RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL+REMININANO_data2016UL_HIPM_met+HARVESTDR2_REMININANO_data2016UL_HIPM_met.log

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3000404
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3000376
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Sep 2, 2021

The failure is not related to this PR,
see #35121

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Sep 2, 2021

Please test with #35121

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8b8ec3/18246/summary.html
COMMIT: 73dc6aa
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-01-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35104/18246/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3000404
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3000382
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

AdrianoDee commented Sep 7, 2021

+upgrade

  • code changes consistent with the PR description (adding comments + removing ‘detIdInfoInMultiCluster struct)
  • no changes seen (in reco, DQM, TriggerResults, ...), as expected

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 7, 2021

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Sep 7, 2021

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants