Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HLT menu development for 12_3_X [12_4_X] #37754

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 2, 2022

Conversation

missirol
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Development of HLT menus for CMSSW_12_3_X.

This is the PR for the master branch, which will then be backported to 12_3_X (which is currently the release used for HLT-menu development for Run 3).

Includes the integration of the following JIRA tickets.

  • Part of CMSHLT-2261: [BPH] Update of low-mass dimuon triggers for Run 3.
  • CMSHLT-2286: [EGM] Removal of "caloTowers" from E/Gamma reconstruction at HLT.
  • CMSHLT-2293: [EGM] Update for Run-3 E/Gamma supercluster energy regression.

The configurations were created with V03-03-00 of ConfDB, which introduces support for ProcessAcceleratorCUDA.

PR validation:

TSG tests.

If this PR is a backport, please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

N/A

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37754/29626

  • This PR adds an extra 820KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @missirol (Marino Missiroli) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • HLTrigger/Configuration (hlt)

@cmsbuild, @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @silviodonato this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cbee91/24357/summary.html
COMMIT: 8c48380
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-04-30-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/37754/24357/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3689356
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 68
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 162
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3689104
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -8633.58 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): -1438.902 KiB HLT/HLTEgammaValidation
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): -0.027 KiB HLT/Filters
  • Checked 205 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 6 / 48 workflows

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor Author

missirol commented May 1, 2022

The large reduction of DQM outputs in HLT/HLTEgammaValidation is related to the changes in this PR to E/Gamma triggers.

One of the ED producers used in those triggers is changed by this PR (EgammaHLTBcHcalIsolationProducersRegional replaced by EgammaHLTHcalVarProducerFromRecHit), and the DQM/Validation client does not recognize the new modules, because it hard-codes the types of the acceptable ED producers (see here, for example).

This patch [*] is a starting point to fix the issue, but this task is left to EGM and/or DQM experts.

In my opinion, this should not delay this PR.

Attn: @cms-sw/dqm-l2 @cms-sw/egamma-pog-l2

[*]

diff --git a/HLTriggerOffline/Egamma/src/EmDQM.cc b/HLTriggerOffline/Egamma/src/EmDQM.cc
index 0a1fb605a98..43c0e8f9f17 100644
--- a/HLTriggerOffline/Egamma/src/EmDQM.cc
+++ b/HLTriggerOffline/Egamma/src/EmDQM.cc
@@ -1442,6 +1442,7 @@ edm::ParameterSet EmDQM::makePSetForEgammaGenericFilter(const std::string &modul
       inputType == "EgammaHLTGsfTrackVarProducer" ||               // GSF track deta and dphi filter
       inputType == "EgammaHLTBcHcalIsolationProducersRegional" ||  // HCAL isolation and
                                                                    // HE
+      inputType == "EgammaHLTHcalVarProducerFromRecHit" ||         // HCAL isolation (H/E) from RecHits
       inputType == "EgammaHLTEcalPFClusterIsolationProducer" ||    // ECAL PF isolation
                                                                    // filter
       inputType == "EgammaHLTHcalPFClusterIsolationProducer" ||    // HCAL PF isolation
@@ -1530,6 +1531,7 @@ edm::ParameterSet EmDQM::makePSetForEgammaGenericQuadraticFilter(const std::stri
       inputType == "EgammaHLTHcalIsolationProducersRegional" ||      // HCAL isolation and HE
       inputType == "EgammaHLTBcHcalIsolationProducersRegional" ||    // HCAL isolation and
                                                                      // HE
+      inputType == "EgammaHLTHcalVarProducerFromRecHit" ||           // HCAL isolation (H/E) from RecHits
       inputType == "EgammaHLTEcalPFClusterIsolationProducer" ||      // ECAL PF isolation
                                                                      // filter
       inputType == "EgammaHLTHcalPFClusterIsolationProducer" ||      // HCAL PF isolation

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor Author

missirol commented May 1, 2022

+hlt

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 1, 2022

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented May 1, 2022

The large reduction of DQM outputs in HLT/HLTEgammaValidation is related to the changes in this PR to E/Gamma triggers.

One of the ED producers used in those triggers is changed by this PR (EgammaHLTBcHcalIsolationProducersRegional replaced by EgammaHLTHcalVarProducerFromRecHit), and the DQM/Validation client does not recognize the new modules, because it hard-codes the types of the acceptable ED producers (see here, for example).

This patch [*] is a starting point to fix the issue, but this task is left to EGM and/or DQM experts.

In my opinion, this should not delay this PR.

Attn: @cms-sw/dqm-l2 @cms-sw/egamma-pog-l2

[*]

diff --git a/HLTriggerOffline/Egamma/src/EmDQM.cc b/HLTriggerOffline/Egamma/src/EmDQM.cc
index 0a1fb605a98..43c0e8f9f17 100644
--- a/HLTriggerOffline/Egamma/src/EmDQM.cc
+++ b/HLTriggerOffline/Egamma/src/EmDQM.cc
@@ -1442,6 +1442,7 @@ edm::ParameterSet EmDQM::makePSetForEgammaGenericFilter(const std::string &modul
       inputType == "EgammaHLTGsfTrackVarProducer" ||               // GSF track deta and dphi filter
       inputType == "EgammaHLTBcHcalIsolationProducersRegional" ||  // HCAL isolation and
                                                                    // HE
+      inputType == "EgammaHLTHcalVarProducerFromRecHit" ||         // HCAL isolation (H/E) from RecHits
       inputType == "EgammaHLTEcalPFClusterIsolationProducer" ||    // ECAL PF isolation
                                                                    // filter
       inputType == "EgammaHLTHcalPFClusterIsolationProducer" ||    // HCAL PF isolation
@@ -1530,6 +1531,7 @@ edm::ParameterSet EmDQM::makePSetForEgammaGenericQuadraticFilter(const std::stri
       inputType == "EgammaHLTHcalIsolationProducersRegional" ||      // HCAL isolation and HE
       inputType == "EgammaHLTBcHcalIsolationProducersRegional" ||    // HCAL isolation and
                                                                      // HE
+      inputType == "EgammaHLTHcalVarProducerFromRecHit" ||           // HCAL isolation (H/E) from RecHits
       inputType == "EgammaHLTEcalPFClusterIsolationProducer" ||      // ECAL PF isolation
                                                                      // filter
       inputType == "EgammaHLTHcalPFClusterIsolationProducer" ||      // HCAL PF isolation

@missirol the fix that you propose is quite logical and straightforward.

I would rather be in favour to include it here, and in the backport PR as well, so that (1) the new menu and the needed dqm update can go on together, and (2) the comparisons in the PR tests remain meaningful.

(By the way, since you are there please also move up the commented "HE" and "filter" in the lines above and below, for a better reading; if the code-format checks split the line again, you can replace "isolation" with "isol" (e.g.), which is still a nicer read than having the last word of the line split)

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor Author

missirol commented May 1, 2022

I would rather be in favour to include it here [..]

Okay, done. References in the DQM module to plugin types that don't exist anymore have been removed as well.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 1, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37754/29636

  • This PR adds an extra 832KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 1, 2022

Pull request #37754 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @missirol, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor Author

missirol commented May 1, 2022

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 1, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cbee91/24362/summary.html
COMMIT: 5e18d42
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-05-01-0000/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37754/24362/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3704128
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 74
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 162
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3703870
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.162 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): -0.027 KiB HLT/Filters
  • Checked 205 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 6 / 48 workflows

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor Author

missirol commented May 1, 2022

Based on the outputs of the PR tests, the update of the DQM module worked as expected (no unexpected differences).

@cms-sw/dqm-l2 , this PR now requires your signature.

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor Author

missirol commented May 1, 2022

+hlt

  • differences in outputs of Run-3 wfs are in line with changes to the HLT GRun menu.
  • includes a related update to a DQM/Validation plugin.

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor Author

missirol commented May 2, 2022

@cms-sw/dqm-l2 , please consider reviewing this PR (it contains a simple update to 1 DQM module).

There are more updates to the HLT menu in the pipeline, so it would be good to integrate this PR and test it in IBs sooner rather than later.

@emanueleusai
Copy link
Member

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 2, 2022

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented May 2, 2022

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants