New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
miscellaneous improvements in CondFormats/PCLConfig
#38286
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38286/30439
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @ggovi, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38286/30444
|
please test |
type trk |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUT
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Not clear from the log what is the reason of failure. I am not expecting this to affect any workflow. |
@cmsbuild please test
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4c313f/25370/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR is a follow-up to #38195, introducing miscellaneous improvements to the
CondFormats/PCLConfig
package.enum
s for not yet used parameters and changed the logic to calculate the payload versionAlignPCLThresholdsWriter
writer class;printAll()
method ofAlignPCLThresholdsHG
in order to give a more synoptic view of the parameters;PR validation:
run the dedicated unit tests:
scram b runtests
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A