Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GEM alignment in all Run3 GTs and update BeamSpot in Run3 MC GTs #38692

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jul 15, 2022

Conversation

francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

@francescobrivio francescobrivio commented Jul 11, 2022

PR description:

In this PR we add:

  • the new GEM Alignment and AlignmentErrors tags to all Run3 GTs (CMSTalk post)
    • In order to be consistent with these new tags (and with the GEM geometry already in use in HLT/Express/Prompt), the data and data_relval GTs have also been updated with the latest GEMRECO_Geometry tag (from v2 to v3)
  • the new BeamSpot for Run 3 collisions at 13.6 TeV in all Run3 MC GTs
  • new DroboxMetaData tag for the Express and Prompt frozen GTs and in the data and data_relval GTs (CMSTalk post)

The new GEM tags are:
GEMAlignment_hlt_v2
GEMAlignment_express_v2
GEMAlignment_prompt_v2
GEMAlignment_v2
GEMAlignment_MC_v1
GEMAlignment_ideal_MC_v1

GEMAlignmentErrorExtended_6x6_hlt_v2
GEMAlignmentErrorExtended_6x6_express_v2
GEMAlignmentErrorExtended_6x6_prompt_v2
GEMAlignmentErrorExtended_6x6_v2
GEMAlignmentErrorExtended_6x6_MC_v1
GEMAlignmentErrorExtended_6x6_ideal_MC_v1

The GEMRECO geometry tag is:
GEMRECO_Geometry_v3_hlt

The new BeamSpot tags are:
BeamSpotObjects_Realistic25ns_13p6TeVCollisions_Early2022_v1_mc
BeamSpotOnlineObjects_Realistic25ns_13p6TeVCollisions_Early2022_v1_mc

The new DMD tag is:
DropBoxMetadata_v8_express

GT Diffs:

PR validation:

Tested with
runTheMatrix.py -l 139.001,138.4,138.5,12034.0,11634.0,7.23,159.0,12434.0,12834.0 --ibeos -j 16

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, but a 12_4_X backport will be provided soon

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38692/30990

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @francescobrivio for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/AlCa (alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @mmusich, @fabiocos, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8fc0cf/26150/summary.html
COMMIT: fb3b459
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-11-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38692/26150/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-beam_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS
---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-mutracking_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS
---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-pixel_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS

RelVals

----- Begin Fatal Exception 12-Jul-2022 00:41:22 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'NoRecord' occurred while
   [0] Calling method for module GEMDigiProducer/'simMuonGEMDigis'
   [1] Calling method for EventSetup module GEMGeometryESModule/'gemGeometry'
   [2] While getting dependent Record from Record MuonGeometryRecord
Exception Message:
No "GEMAlignmentRcd" record found in the EventSetup.

 Please add an ESSource or ESProducer that delivers such a record.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------
----- Begin Fatal Exception 12-Jul-2022 00:41:24 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'NoRecord' occurred while
   [0] Calling method for module GEMDigiProducer/'simMuonGEMDigis'
   [1] Calling method for EventSetup module GEMGeometryESModule/'gemGeometry'
   [2] While getting dependent Record from Record MuonGeometryRecord
Exception Message:
No "GEMAlignmentRcd" record found in the EventSetup.

 Please add an ESSource or ESProducer that delivers such a record.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------
----- Begin Fatal Exception 12-Jul-2022 00:41:50 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'NoRecord' occurred while
   [0] Calling method for module GEMDigiProducer/'simMuonGEMDigis'
   [1] Calling method for EventSetup module GEMGeometryESModule/'gemGeometry'
   [2] While getting dependent Record from Record MuonGeometryRecord
Exception Message:
No "GEMAlignmentRcd" record found in the EventSetup.

 Please add an ESSource or ESProducer that delivers such a record.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------
Expand to see more relval errors ...

RelVals-INPUT

  • 23234.023234.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D49+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14INPUT+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal/step2_TTbar_14TeV+2026D49+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14INPUT+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal.log
  • 23234.2123234.21_TTbar_14TeV+2026D49_ProdLike+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14INPUT+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+MiniAOD/step2_TTbar_14TeV+2026D49_ProdLike+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14INPUT+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+MiniAOD.log
  • 23434.2123434.21_TTbar_14TeV+2026D49PU_ProdLike+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14INPUT+DigiTriggerPU+RecoGlobalPU+MiniAODPU/step2_TTbar_14TeV+2026D49PU_ProdLike+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14INPUT+DigiTriggerPU+RecoGlobalPU+MiniAODPU.log
Expand to see more relval errors ...

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38692/30999

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8fc0cf/26177/summary.html
COMMIT: 95d0e5f
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-12-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38692/26177/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-gem_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-8fc0cf/12034.0_TTbar_14TeV+2021Design+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSim+Digi+RecoNano+HARVESTNano
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-8fc0cf/7.23_Cosmics_UP21+Cosmics_UP21+DIGICOS_UP21+RECOCOS_UP21+ALCACOS_UP21+HARVESTCOS_UP21

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 23132 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 54
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4116336
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 65543
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4050764
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 2.254 KiB( 53 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11834.0 ): 2.250 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 227 log files, 45 edm output root files, 54 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 8 / 53 workflows

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

Since the GEM fix for DQM might take a while (see #38666 (comment)) I want to test this PR without that PR.

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:
*

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

  • workflows = 12034.0,11634.0,7.23,159.0,12434.0,12834.0

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8fc0cf/26239/summary.html
COMMIT: 95d0e5f
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-13-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38692/26239/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-8fc0cf/12034.0_TTbar_14TeV+2021Design+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSim+Digi+RecoNano+HARVESTNano
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-8fc0cf/7.23_Cosmics_UP21+Cosmics_UP21+DIGICOS_UP21+RECOCOS_UP21+ALCACOS_UP21+HARVESTCOS_UP21

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 23133 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 54
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4116592
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 65531
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4051032
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 2.246 KiB( 53 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11834.0 ): 2.250 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 227 log files, 45 edm output root files, 54 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 8 / 53 workflows

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jul 15, 2022

+alca

  • tests pass, changes are widespread, but in line with the conditions changes in the GT

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Differences in the run3 workflows had been evaluated as being compatible with the GT changed

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit a1ba0ee into cms-sw:master Jul 15, 2022
@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jul 15, 2022

@perrotta @cms-sw/alca-l2 merging this PR as is has been a mistake.
The reconstruction level beamspot is now totally out of synch with the vertex smearing used for the Run3 workflows, completely destroying tracking performance.
Please either revert or fix ASAP.

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please either revert or fix

How do we update the Run 3 workflow? (sorry if the question is naive....)
I'll be able to work on this only tomorrow btw

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jul 15, 2022

@francescobrivio here

'BeamSpot': 'Run3RoundOptics25ns13TeVLowSigmaZ',

and elsewhere, where relevant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants