Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HCAL: Group 0 LUT edited to set LLP bits in HB only, not HE #38896

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 2, 2022

Conversation

gk199
Copy link
Contributor

@gk199 gk199 commented Jul 29, 2022

PR description:

Edits are made such that the HCAL Group 0 LUT only sets LLP bits in HB, not HE. Current uHTR firmware only accepts the LUTs with the high bits (bits 12-15) set in HB, not in HE. This can be reversed to set the LUT bits for both HB and HE when the firmware is modified. The initial PR setting the HCAL LUT is in PR #35599, where more details on the specifications are given as well. Discussed with @Michael-Krohn in detail about the HCAL LUT generation.

PR validation:

runTheMatrix passed, tested in CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-28-2300.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38896/31330

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @gk199 (Gillian Kopp) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • CalibCalorimetry/HcalTPGAlgos (l1, alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @epalencia, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @tvami, @ChrisMisan, @cecilecaillol, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@bsunanda, @mmusich, @abdoulline, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor

type hcal

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-76b1df/26533/summary.html
COMMIT: 1913c7c
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-29-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38896/26533/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3668050
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3667994
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 210 log files, 47 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 50 workflows

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor

+alca

  • differences in the comparison were expected
  • tests pass
  • PR changes in line with the description

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 1, 2022

@Michael-Krohn @gk199 is this relevant for HI only? You didnt mention anything about backports...

@Michael-Krohn
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for catching that @tvami. This is relevant for the Run3 physics data taking, so if backports are still open to 12_4_X then @gk199 can you also open a PR that backports this to that release?

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 1, 2022

Well they are closed and open at the same time... :D If this is needed for data taking and it's considered to be fixing a bug, it can go back to 12_4_X for a patch release (possibly coming out tomorrow) @Michael-Krohn

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 1, 2022

urgent

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the urgent label Aug 1, 2022
@Michael-Krohn
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is created to match what is done currently on detector in the HCAL uHTRs so it is considered a bug fix

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 1, 2022

type bugfix

@gk199
Copy link
Contributor Author

gk199 commented Aug 1, 2022

@tvami and @Michael-Krohn I just opened a backport to 12_4_X, #38923, since this is relevant for Run 3 data taking, thanks for catching that.

@epalencia
Copy link
Contributor

+l1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 1, 2022

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Aug 2, 2022

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants