New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix run-by-run TkAlignment PV Validation submission script in case of extra conditions #39091
Conversation
type trk, bug-fix |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39091/31607
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild , please test
|
your doubt is not justified: cmssw/Alignment/OfflineValidation/test/BuildFile.xml Lines 18 to 21 in aef58e8
cmssw/Alignment/OfflineValidation/test/testSubmitters.sh Lines 4 to 5 in aef58e8
|
Ahh great! This is the case when I'm happy to be wrong :) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3083f2/26879/summary.html Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
|
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Title says it all, discovered during the 13.6TeV alignment campaign when using updated pixel templates (cf here )
PR validation:
Private
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, but will need to be backported