Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix run-by-run TkAlignment PV Validation submission script in case of extra conditions #39091

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 17, 2022

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Aug 17, 2022

PR description:

Title says it all, discovered during the 13.6TeV alignment campaign when using updated pixel templates (cf here )

PR validation:

Private

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, but will need to be backported

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Aug 17, 2022

type trk, bug-fix

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39091/31607

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Alignment/OfflineValidation (alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @adewit, @tocheng, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 17, 2022

@cmsbuild , please test

  • I doubt anything is testing this specific change, but ok...

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Aug 17, 2022

I doubt anything is testing this specific change, but ok...

your doubt is not justified:

<bin file="testAlignmentOfflineValidation.cpp" name="testSubmitters">
<flags TEST_RUNNER_ARGS=" /bin/bash Alignment/OfflineValidation/test testSubmitters.sh"/>
<use name="FWCore/Utilities"/>
</bin>

echo " TESTING Primary Vertex Validation run-by-run submission ..."
submitPVValidationJobs.py -j UNIT_TEST -D /HLTPhysics/Run2016C-TkAlMinBias-07Dec2018-v1/ALCARECO -i ${LOCAL_TEST_DIR}/testPVValidation_Relvals_DATA.ini -r --unitTest || die "Failure running PV Validation run-by-run submission" $?

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 17, 2022

your doubt is not justified:

Ahh great! This is the case when I'm happy to be wrong :)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3083f2/26879/summary.html
COMMIT: 7a2d2ab
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-08-17-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/39091/26879/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
136.9 step 4
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3692500
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3692464
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 17, 2022

+alca

  • unit test passes
  • jenkins tests pass (MTD and MsgLogger diffs only)
  • PR according to the desc

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants