New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12.4.X] introduce DiMuonMassBiasMonitor
and DiMuonMassBiasClient
#39166
[12.4.X] introduce DiMuonMassBiasMonitor
and DiMuonMassBiasClient
#39166
Conversation
…asClient, update sequence run in alcareco production, update unit tests
type trk, new-feature |
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_12_4_X. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test testDiMuonVertexMonitor had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@mmusich given that this is the DQM part, I assume it's not needed for the ReReco (of 2022A/2022B). Is that correct? |
I guess I should also ask, independently of #39166 (comment) would you like this to be part of the next 12_4_X that is supposed to be cut today/tomorrow? |
yes. |
Pull request #39166 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
this applies only to online DQM, and not offline DQM that runs concurrently with the reconstruction at Tier-0.
It's not needed for re-reco, but it will be useful to get it for the upcoming Prompt Reco of the rest of 2022 data. |
Given the pause in the LHC runs, we will still have several days (weeks?) without beam. Let build the release for the re-reco now, as planned, then. Another 12_4_X release for the MC production will follow. If this (and possibly additional) PRs will be needed at T0 before that, we can still make a patch release with them, |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a5b591/27053/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
…rt concurrent lumis
Pull request #39166 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
enable threading |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a5b591/27063/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
last IB relvals look clean after the last bugfix was pushed in master. Any residual objection to merge this PR @cms-sw/orp-l2 ? |
backport of #39148 and #39128
PR description:
The purpose of this PR is to expand on the concept introduced at #38425, about adding the DQM monitoring for the
ALCARECOTkAlDiMuonAndVertex
stream and adds a new DQM Analyzer (DiMuonMassBiasMonitor
) to monitor the bias of the di-muon mass system as a function of the component track kinematics.In addition it adds a client
DQMEDHarvester
to create profiles of the mass bias vs track kinematics, based on the 2DMonitorElements
introduced.PR validation:
Run the (augmented) unit tests of this package and also run manually on 2022C data obtaining the fits at this link.
The resulting DQM file has been uploaded to a private GUI that is available by:
and visiting:
https://tinyurl.com/2pwdox97
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
verbatim backport of #39148 and #39128