Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to TICLv4 for offline HGCAL electrons and photons #39810

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 27, 2022

Conversation

SohamBhattacharya
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR switches to TICLv4 for offline HGCAL electrons and photons.

The following plots were obtained using these samples:

  • SingleElectron_Pt-2To200-gun/PhaseIISpring22DRMiniAOD-PU200_123X_mcRun4_realistic_v11-v1/GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW-MINIAOD
  • SinglePhoton_Pt-2To200-gun/PhaseIISpring22DRMiniAOD-PU200_123X_mcRun4_realistic_v11-v1/GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW-MINIAOD

Expected consequences:

  • The electron reco efficiency should increase:

  • The photon reco efficiency should increase:

  • The electron mis-reco (i.e. reco electrons not $\Delta R$ matched to any gen-electron) efficiency should not change much:

  • The photon mis-reco (i.e. reco-photons not $\Delta R$ matched to any gen-photons) efficiency should not change much:

  • The electron and photon energy responses (recoE/genE) should remain fairly the same.

@swagata87 @rovere @felicepantaleo

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39810/32680

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @SohamBhattacharya for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducer (reconstruction)

@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @felicepantaleo, @rovere, @lgray, @missirol, @lecriste, @hatakeyamak, @ebrondol, @sameasy, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@rovere
Copy link
Contributor

rovere commented Oct 21, 2022

@cmsbuild please test

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

AdrianoDee commented Oct 21, 2022

assign upgrade
(to have the tag and be notified)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: upgrade

@AdrianoDee,@srimanob you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d82430/28417/summary.html
COMMIT: ee85039
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-20-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39810/28417/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 1067 differences found in the comparisons
  • Reco comparison had 6 failed jobs
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3391158
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2949
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3388187
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 201 log files, 48 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild enable profiling

@rovere
Copy link
Contributor

rovere commented Oct 21, 2022

enable profiling

@rovere
Copy link
Contributor

rovere commented Oct 21, 2022

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d82430/28425/summary.html
COMMIT: ee85039
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-21-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
Additional Tests: PROFILING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39810/28425/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 1070 differences found in the comparisons
  • Reco comparison had 6 failed jobs
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3378384
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2949
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3375413
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 201 log files, 48 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@rovere
Copy link
Contributor

rovere commented Oct 22, 2022

@SohamBhattacharya thanks! the timing went down considerably as well with this PR.
I believe, once integrated, this will address #39482

@swagata87
Copy link
Contributor

indeed, I am looking at WF 21034.21, and there are some timing reductions for electron related modules. For example:

Rank			Total%	 		Cumulative					Delta						Symbol name
[1    -> 23  ] [5.9    -> 0.7   ]  [102.23    -> 10.03    ]         [ 10.03    /1456.79   - 102.23   /1732.13   *100% ] = [-5.21 % ]         ElectronSeedProducer::produce    
                 
[0    -> 0   ] [14.2   -> 13.1  ]  [246.21    -> 190.39   ]         [ 190.39   /1456.79   - 246.21   /1732.13   *100% ] = [-1.15 % ]         cms::CkfTrackCandidateMakerBase::produceBase      

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

+reconstruction

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants