New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make sure variables are preserved in ReggeGribovPartonMCInterface #40962
Make sure variables are preserved in ReggeGribovPartonMCInterface #40962
Conversation
The routine assumes the variable am is retained between calls. This is only guaranteed across compiles if one uses `save`.
The code expects the values of the arrays to be preserved between calls. This is handled via the `save` keyword.
please test |
@makortel FYI |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40962/34462
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages:
@SiewYan, @mkirsano, @Saptaparna, @alberto-sanchez, @menglu21, @GurpreetSinghChahal can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test for el8_aarch64_gcc11 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b2910a/31093/summary.html |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b2910a/31092/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cms-sw/generators-l2 ping |
ping @cms-sw/generators-l2 |
1 similar comment
ping @cms-sw/generators-l2 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
The compiler had warnings about possibly uninitialized values in the FORTRAN. Looking at the algorithm, the code expects the subroutine values to be preserved between calls. The portable way of doing that is to use the
save
keyword.One of the previous uninitialized fixes incorrectly reset the value of an array each call rather than using
save
which is needed for the algorithm to properly work.PR validation:
The code compiles. As the warning was in the aarch64 build and I do not have access to that machine, it is unclear if the warning will go away.