Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

delete lumi based MEs when the LS processing is over #5866

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 21, 2014

Conversation

deguio
Copy link
Contributor

@deguio deguio commented Oct 17, 2014

forward port of #5682 to 72

move LS histo removal in mergeAndResetMEsLuminositySummaryCache

add function markForDeletion to DQMStore

shrink down the markForDeletion function

fix invalid iterator

move markedToDelete and markToDelete to be private in the MonitorElement class

added a comment to the markToDelete method
@deguio
Copy link
Contributor Author

deguio commented Oct 17, 2014

+1
provided passes the tests

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_7_2_X milestone Oct 17, 2014
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @nclopezo can you please take care of it?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo can you please take care of it?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo can you please take care of it?

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2014
delete lumi based MEs when the LS processing is over
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 75c555a into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_2_X Oct 21, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants