Add impact parameter significance histograms to tracking DQM

[makortel]

Add following histograms for impact parameter significances

• dxy and dz wrt. both primary vertex and beam spot
• signed 2D and 3D impact parameters wrt. primary vertex as defined in IPTools

Add a new flag doSIPPlots to control if they're filled or not. By default it is set to False, and enabled when DCA histograms are.

Tested in CMSSW_7_5_X_2015-03-15-1400. Should have no effect on any existing histogram, just adds new ones.

@rovere @VinInn @kmcdermo @mtosi

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Add impact parameter significance histograms to tracking DQM

It involves the following packages:

DQM/TrackingMonitor
DQM/TrackingMonitorSource

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @nclopezo, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 0c5b578
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8410/3632/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8410/3632/summary.html
There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
401.0 step 1
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals

[deguio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @ktf, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1