Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix SLM check for restore in progress #50868

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 10, 2020

Conversation

dakrone
Copy link
Member

@dakrone dakrone commented Jan 10, 2020

This commit fixes the check in SLM where the RestoreInProgress
metadata was checked for existence. Rather than check existence we
should instead check the isEmpty method. Prior to this, a successful
restore for a repository that used SLM retention would prevent SLM
retention from running in subsequent invocations, due to SLM thinking
that a restore was still running.

This commit fixes the check in SLM where the `RestoreInProgress`
metadata was checked for existence. Rather than check existence we
should instead check the `isEmpty` method. Prior to this, a successful
restore for a repository that used SLM retention would prevent SLM
retention from running in subsequent invocations, due to SLM thinking
that a restore was still running.
@dakrone dakrone added >bug :Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management v8.0.0 v7.6.0 v7.5.2 labels Jan 10, 2020
@dakrone dakrone requested a review from gwbrown January 10, 2020 18:28
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (:Core/Features/ILM+SLM)

Copy link
Contributor

@gwbrown gwbrown left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nasty bug. Fix LGTM.

logger.info("--> snapshot [{}] has been deleted", snapshotName);
} catch (RepositoryException re) {
// Concurrent status calls and write operations may lead to failures in determining the current repository generation
// TODO: Remove this hack once tracking the current repository generation has been made consistent
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't need to block this PR on it, but we should check if this hack is still necessary.

@dakrone dakrone merged commit c83aceb into elastic:master Jan 10, 2020
@dakrone dakrone deleted the slm-fix-restore-check branch January 10, 2020 20:34
dakrone added a commit to dakrone/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
* Fix SLM check for restore in progress

This commit fixes the check in SLM where the `RestoreInProgress`
metadata was checked for existence. Rather than check existence we
should instead check the `isEmpty` method. Prior to this, a successful
restore for a repository that used SLM retention would prevent SLM
retention from running in subsequent invocations, due to SLM thinking
that a restore was still running.
dakrone added a commit to dakrone/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
* Fix SLM check for restore in progress

This commit fixes the check in SLM where the `RestoreInProgress`
metadata was checked for existence. Rather than check existence we
should instead check the `isEmpty` method. Prior to this, a successful
restore for a repository that used SLM retention would prevent SLM
retention from running in subsequent invocations, due to SLM thinking
that a restore was still running.
dakrone added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
* Fix SLM check for restore in progress (#50868)

* Fix SLM check for restore in progress

This commit fixes the check in SLM where the `RestoreInProgress`
metadata was checked for existence. Rather than check existence we
should instead check the `isEmpty` method. Prior to this, a successful
restore for a repository that used SLM retention would prevent SLM
retention from running in subsequent invocations, due to SLM thinking
that a restore was still running.

* Fix 7.x-isms
dakrone added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
* Fix SLM check for restore in progress (#50868)

* Fix SLM check for restore in progress

This commit fixes the check in SLM where the `RestoreInProgress`
metadata was checked for existence. Rather than check existence we
should instead check the `isEmpty` method. Prior to this, a successful
restore for a repository that used SLM retention would prevent SLM
retention from running in subsequent invocations, due to SLM thinking
that a restore was still running.

* Fix 7.x-isms
SivagurunathanV pushed a commit to SivagurunathanV/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2020
* Fix SLM check for restore in progress

This commit fixes the check in SLM where the `RestoreInProgress`
metadata was checked for existence. Rather than check existence we
should instead check the `isEmpty` method. Prior to this, a successful
restore for a repository that used SLM retention would prevent SLM
retention from running in subsequent invocations, due to SLM thinking
that a restore was still running.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants