New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test on CRUD operations on RuntimeClasses API #96551
Test on CRUD operations on RuntimeClasses API #96551
Conversation
@SergeyKanzhelev: This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
5e275ab
to
f1abcf0
Compare
Test passes
|
6f123cc
to
d7ac009
Compare
The runtimeclasses resource MUST exist in the /apis/node.k8s.io/v1 discovery document. | ||
The runtimeclasses resource must support create, get, list, watch, update, patch, delete, and deletecollection. | ||
*/ | ||
ginkgo.It(" [NodeConformance] should support RuntimeClasses API operations", func() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
keeping it as a regular test for now. Also added [NodeConformance]
so it will run during the PR validation
Merge first, then we will need a separate promotion PR with the conformance metadata. |
Exception request: https://groups.google.com/g/kubernetes-sig-node/c/UhZ7JgaeZPE |
d7ac009
to
3af0ab4
Compare
/test pull-kubernetes-bazel-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
To unblock RuntimeClass to GA. It still strikes me as odd that we need to write out these tests in full, so we should make sure to deduplicate these in the future.
/lgtm Agree with @tallclair above. On another hand, I hope the pr can move forward, so that the test can run over the weekend. Thanks! |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dchen1107, SergeyKanzhelev, tallclair The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
/kind regression
/sig node
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR added a test to be promoted to conformance that exercise all CRUD operations of RuntimeClasses API.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Related #96524
(The follow up PR that will promote the test to conformance will fix it)
Special notes for your reviewer:
Added comments needed for conformance, but keep it regular test for presubmits to run it.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: