support for undefined taxa and for percentages of seqlengths #121
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi @DerrickWood , I was having issues with my personal database where I edited my own taxonomy and where I needed to assess contigs instead of reads. Where I messed up the taxonomy, I created a better warning message and added a category "UNKNOWN" to the report.
Also, instead of proportions of the taxonomy being rated by seq count, I changed it to seq lengths. This adds more meaning to me in the report and avoids skewing the report from smaller contigs.
Even if my revisions are taken as suggestions, thank you for taking the time to look it over.