Version Packages #127
Merged
Version Packages #127
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
github-actions
bot
force-pushed
the
changeset-release/main
branch
from
96d0b6c
to
354ebdf
Compare
github-actions
bot
force-pushed
the
changeset-release/main
branch
from
354ebdf
to
32642af
Compare
kitten
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.
Releases
gql.tada@1.3.3
Patch Changes
$tada.refvalue on$tada.fragmentRefsdefinitions for masked fragments with typename string literal. The record for fragment masks is already namespaced, so there wasn't a need to use a symbol value here, and this further increases readability and usefulnessSubmitted by @kitten (See #126)
readFragment()to accept the document as a generic rather than a (runtime value) argument. This replaces the complex mapping type for input arguments, and hence drops the (undocumented) support for nested arrays being passed to itSubmitted by @kitten (See #128)