Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update taxonomy lables to include field descriptions, back links, etc #85

Closed
1 task done
peterwilsoncc opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #112
Closed
1 task done

Update taxonomy lables to include field descriptions, back links, etc #85

peterwilsoncc opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #112
Assignees
Labels
type:enhancement New feature or request.
Milestone

Comments

@peterwilsoncc
Copy link
Contributor

Is your enhancement related to a problem? Please describe.

In 6.0 the ability to customise the labels on a taxonomy's edit screen was introduced. This allow for the plugin to use context appropriate labels. For example avoid "URL" in the slug label.

Additionally, the use of labels should be reviewed to ensure any that appear on screen are populated

At least the following labels can be added

  • name_field_description
  • slug_field_description
  • parent_field_description
  • popular_items
  • parent_item
  • parent_item_colon
  • no_terms
  • back_to_items

Designs

After

Screen Shot 2022-05-12 at 3 42 03 pm

Before

Screen Shot 2022-05-12 at 3 40 59 pm

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@peterwilsoncc peterwilsoncc added the type:enhancement New feature or request. label May 12, 2022
@Sidsector9 Sidsector9 added this to the 1.3.0 milestone Jun 23, 2022
@jayedul jayedul self-assigned this Feb 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:enhancement New feature or request.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants