New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bulk editing all attributes of selected connections #83
Comments
@VShawn , check out description for how I thought this could work. |
WIP |
Nice, looking forward to test that. Keep in mind that both UI's (panes vs list) should in principle have the same options. |
Done most of the work, The radio button needs to be replaced with combobox in the next step |
Works great, didn't find any issues. |
About missing things:
|
Cancel button doesn't work |
Cancel that shows on the list when you select multiple items |
Yes I forgot that button. 😆 |
1. title for bulk editor. 2. search by group name. 3. count of selected
I think we've all done this |
Cant see that Select 2 items although I see you are editing in bulk. I would make it more visually distinct tho, I would never notice it if I didn't see screenshot. BTW, make it With this major feature done, I would suggest doing #107 next - the bulk connect is awesome but it has 1 big problem - you can't save arbitrary connection lists for bulk connection since connection can have only one group, and you also probably want to group connection based on something else then bulk connecting. Example: I have 2 database servers on a project along with N other connections. Group name is the name of the project, but I want to connect to db servers only, not anything else. Currently I have to always select db connections then bulk connect. With tags, I could create arbitrary connection lists and bulk connect to them with appropriate UI in single step. |
1. title for bulk editor. 2. search by group name. 3. count of selected
Idea in nutshell is:
<multiple values>
or<unchanged>
One decision should be made: if group edit is allowed with multiple protocols or not. I don't think its much of a hassle to implement any of it, but single protocol may be a bit easier.
Some benefits of this approach are:
Screen mockups
From discussion at #34
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: