New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Workaround for RetroCL exclude attrs missing dependency #4791
Comments
jchapma
changed the title
Work around for missing dependency
Workaround for RetroCL exclude attrs missing dependency
Jun 3, 2021
jchapma
added a commit
to jchapma/389-ds-base
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2021
Description: The RetroCL exclude attribute RFE is dependent on functionality of the EntryUUID bug fix, that didn't make into the latest build. This breaks the RetroCL exclude attr feature so we need to provide a workaround. Fixes: 389ds#4791 Relates: 389ds#4723 Relates: 389ds#4224 Reviewed by: tbordaz, droideck (Thank you)
jchapma
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2021
Description: The RetroCL exclude attribute RFE is dependent on functionality of the EntryUUID bug fix, that didn't make into the latest build. This breaks the RetroCL exclude attr feature so we need to provide a workaround. Fixes: #4791 Relates: #4723 Relates: #4224 Reviewed by: tbordaz, droideck (Thank you)
jchapma
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 15, 2021
Description: The RetroCL exclude attribute RFE is dependent on functionality of the EntryUUID bug fix, that didn't make into the latest build. This breaks the RetroCL exclude attr feature so we need to provide a workaround. Fixes: #4791 Relates: #4723 Relates: #4224 Reviewed by: tbordaz, droideck (Thank you)
jchapma
added a commit
to jchapma/389-ds-base
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2021
Description: The RetroCL exclude attribute RFE was dependent on the functionality of a commit that didn't make into the rhel 8.5 build. A work around was committed that added the missing methods. Since then the previous commit has been merged, so there now exists two definitions of the same method, these need to be removed. fixes: 389ds#4994 relates: 389ds#4791 Reviewed by: ?
jchapma
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 9, 2021
Description: The RetroCL exclude attribute RFE was dependent on the functionality of a commit that didn't make into the rhel 8.5 build. A work around was committed that added the missing methods. Since then the previous commit has been merged, so there now exists two definitions of the same method, these need to be removed. fixes: #4994 relates: #4791 Reviewed by: tbordaz (Merci)
jchapma
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2022
Description: The RetroCL exclude attribute RFE was dependent on the functionality of a commit that didn't make into the rhel 8.5 build. A work around was committed that added the missing methods. Since then the previous commit has been merged, so there now exists two definitions of the same method, these need to be removed. fixes: #4994 relates: #4791 Reviewed by: tbordaz (Merci)
jchapma
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2022
Description: The RetroCL exclude attribute RFE was dependent on the functionality of a commit that didn't make into the rhel 8.5 build. A work around was committed that added the missing methods. Since then the previous commit has been merged, so there now exists two definitions of the same method, these need to be removed. fixes: #4994 relates: #4791 Reviewed by: tbordaz (Merci)
jchapma
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2022
Description: The RetroCL exclude attribute RFE was dependent on the functionality of a commit that didn't make into the rhel 8.5 build. A work around was committed that added the missing methods. Since then the previous commit has been merged, so there now exists two definitions of the same method, these need to be removed. fixes: #4994 relates: #4791 Reviewed by: tbordaz (Merci)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Issue Description
The RetroCL exclude attribute RFE is dependent on the functionality of a EntryUUID bug fix that didn't make into the latest build. This breaks the RetroCL change so we need to provide a workaround.
RetroCL RFE
#4723
EntryUUID
#4224
Affected branches:
Steps to Reproduce
Expected results
The retrocl CI test should pass
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: