Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a funding fee budget #2808

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jan 10, 2024
Merged

Add a funding fee budget #2808

merged 4 commits into from Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

pm47
Copy link
Member

@pm47 pm47 commented Jan 9, 2024

This is based on #2780, with a slightly different implementation.

The fee is checked right after calling fundrawtransaction, which makes it work for both the single and dual funding cases.

Also we use the feeBudget terminology instead of maxFee.

This is based on #2780, with a slightly different implementation.

The fee is checked right after calling `fundrawtransaction`, which makes it work for both the single and dual funding cases.

Also we use the `feeBudget` terminology instead of `maxFee`.
@pm47 pm47 requested a review from t-bast January 9, 2024 15:42
@pm47 pm47 merged commit c37df26 into master Jan 10, 2024
1 check passed
@pm47 pm47 deleted the funding-fee-budget branch January 10, 2024 16:01
t-bast added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 29, 2024
This release introduces a few API changes:

- `bumpforceclose` can be used to make a force-close confirm faster, by
  spending the anchor output (#2743)
- `open` now takes an optional parameter `--fundingFeeBudgetSatoshis` to
  define the maximum acceptable value for the mining fee of the funding
  transaction. This mining fee can sometimes be unexpectedly high
  depending on available UTXOs in the wallet (#2808)
- `rbfopen` now takes a mandatory parameter `--fundingFeeBudgetSatoshis`
  with the same semantics as for `open` (#2808)
- `payoffer` can be used to pay experimental Bolt 12 offers
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants