support for RedBearLabs BLE Nano hardware revision 1.5 #1371

Closed
jrobeson opened this Issue Oct 4, 2015 · 12 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
8 participants
@jrobeson
Contributor

jrobeson commented Oct 4, 2015

1.5 contains 32KB ram unlike the 16KB in the original. Should it be a new platform (like Teensy 3.0) or someting else. Pardon me if this isn't the right place to submit this.

@jrobeson jrobeson changed the title from support for RedBearLabs BLENano hardware revision 1.5 to support for RedBearLabs BLE Nano hardware revision 1.5 Oct 4, 2015

@jrobeson

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jrobeson

jrobeson Oct 9, 2015

Contributor

I think I'll be getting one of these in the next week, so I'd like to know how to name it.

Contributor

jrobeson commented Oct 9, 2015

I think I'll be getting one of these in the next week, so I'd like to know how to name it.

@0xc0170

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@0xc0170

0xc0170 Oct 9, 2015

Member

I believe a new platform is neeed . If up to 1.5 there's 16KB.

Member

0xc0170 commented Oct 9, 2015

I believe a new platform is neeed . If up to 1.5 there's 16KB.

@jrobeson

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jrobeson

jrobeson Oct 9, 2015

Contributor

I'll give it a try once I get one

Contributor

jrobeson commented Oct 9, 2015

I'll give it a try once I get one

@jrobeson

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jrobeson

jrobeson Dec 24, 2015

Contributor

I have one of these, but I wonder if it's worth adding to mbed-classic at this point. I'm already developing with yotta now.

Contributor

jrobeson commented Dec 24, 2015

I have one of these, but I wonder if it's worth adding to mbed-classic at this point. I'm already developing with yotta now.

@alteredworlds

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@alteredworlds

alteredworlds Jan 27, 2016

Can anyone recommend a combination of library versions to get an offline build for mbed-classic working for the BLE Nano v1.5? I've been using embedXcode+ for Arduino (for a different board), but can't get a build working for mbed-classic. Out of interest I tried yotta/Docker (although sounds like this is not recommended for any potential production version for many months?) & also couldn't get any build working for the BLE Nano v1.5. Could easily be user error, of course...! :)

Can anyone recommend a combination of library versions to get an offline build for mbed-classic working for the BLE Nano v1.5? I've been using embedXcode+ for Arduino (for a different board), but can't get a build working for mbed-classic. Out of interest I tried yotta/Docker (although sounds like this is not recommended for any potential production version for many months?) & also couldn't get any build working for the BLE Nano v1.5. Could easily be user error, of course...! :)

@jrobeson

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jrobeson

jrobeson Jan 27, 2016

Contributor

I have blenano 1.5 working with yotta and mbed-os, but it should probably work for mbed classic too. However I'm using my own custom target and hal until the ARM folks publish theirs. It also requires one to edit https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbed-hal-nrf51822-mcu/ since the allowed targets are whitelisted there.

Contributor

jrobeson commented Jan 27, 2016

I have blenano 1.5 working with yotta and mbed-os, but it should probably work for mbed classic too. However I'm using my own custom target and hal until the ARM folks publish theirs. It also requires one to edit https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbed-hal-nrf51822-mcu/ since the allowed targets are whitelisted there.

@jrobeson

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jrobeson

jrobeson Jan 27, 2016

Contributor

NOTE: I haven't published my targets and hal, because @AlessandroA said they will be publishing official ones soon.

Contributor

jrobeson commented Jan 27, 2016

NOTE: I haven't published my targets and hal, because @AlessandroA said they will be publishing official ones soon.

@alteredworlds

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@alteredworlds

alteredworlds Jan 27, 2016

OK, thanks for the info!

Arduino 1.6.7 now seems to be working well for me (with board selection ‘BLE Nano(V1.5 32KB)’), after flashing the latest RedBear mk20 firmware from https://github.com/RedBearLab/nRF51822-Arduino https://github.com/RedBearLab/nRF51822-Arduino

(I had previously applied the firmware as documented at: https://developer.mbed.org/platforms/RedBearLab-BLE-Nano/ https://developer.mbed.org/platforms/RedBearLab-BLE-Nano/)

…so learning about this board can continue!

On 27 Jan 2016, at 09:32, Johnny Robeson notifications@github.com wrote:

NOTE: I haven't published my targets, because @AlessandroA https://github.com/AlessandroA said they will be publishing official ones soon.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #1371 (comment).

OK, thanks for the info!

Arduino 1.6.7 now seems to be working well for me (with board selection ‘BLE Nano(V1.5 32KB)’), after flashing the latest RedBear mk20 firmware from https://github.com/RedBearLab/nRF51822-Arduino https://github.com/RedBearLab/nRF51822-Arduino

(I had previously applied the firmware as documented at: https://developer.mbed.org/platforms/RedBearLab-BLE-Nano/ https://developer.mbed.org/platforms/RedBearLab-BLE-Nano/)

…so learning about this board can continue!

On 27 Jan 2016, at 09:32, Johnny Robeson notifications@github.com wrote:

NOTE: I haven't published my targets, because @AlessandroA https://github.com/AlessandroA said they will be publishing official ones soon.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #1371 (comment).

@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the mirrored label Aug 1, 2016

@ciarmcom

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ciarmcom

ciarmcom Aug 1, 2016

Member

ARM Internal Ref: IOTMORF-235

Member

ciarmcom commented Aug 1, 2016

ARM Internal Ref: IOTMORF-235

@sg- sg- removed the mirrored label Aug 12, 2016

@hotchpotch

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@hotchpotch

hotchpotch Sep 27, 2016

hi.

My BLE Nano V1.5 worked on mbed OS5 this target.json.

However this target.json can't work BLE Nano V1.0...

hotchpotch commented Sep 27, 2016

hi.

My BLE Nano V1.5 worked on mbed OS5 this target.json.

However this target.json can't work BLE Nano V1.0...

@rkyymmt

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment

rkyymmt commented Feb 27, 2017

+1

@ChiefBureaucraticOfficer

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ChiefBureaucraticOfficer

ChiefBureaucraticOfficer Oct 27, 2017

GitHib issue review: Closed due to inactivity. Please re-file if critical issues found.

GitHib issue review: Closed due to inactivity. Please re-file if critical issues found.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment