support for RedBearLabs BLE Nano hardware revision 1.5

[ghost]

1.5 contains 32KB ram unlike the 16KB in the original. Should it be a new platform (like Teensy 3.0) or someting else. Pardon me if this isn't the right place to submit this.

[ghost]

I think I'll be getting one of these in the next week, so I'd like to know how to name it.

[0xc0170]

I believe a new platform is neeed . If up to 1.5 there's 16KB.

[ghost]

I'll give it a try once I get one

[ghost]

I have one of these, but I wonder if it's worth adding to mbed-classic at this point. I'm already developing with yotta now.

[alteredworlds]

Can anyone recommend a combination of library versions to get an offline build for mbed-classic working for the BLE Nano v1.5? I've been using embedXcode+ for Arduino (for a different board), but can't get a build working for mbed-classic. Out of interest I tried yotta/Docker (although sounds like this is not recommended for any potential production version for many months?) & also couldn't get any build working for the BLE Nano v1.5. Could easily be user error, of course...! :)

[ghost]

I have blenano 1.5 working with yotta and mbed-os, but it should probably work for mbed classic too. However I'm using my own custom target and hal until the ARM folks publish theirs. It also requires one to edit https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbed-hal-nrf51822-mcu/ since the allowed targets are whitelisted there.

[ghost]

NOTE: I haven't published my targets and hal, because @AlessandroA said they will be publishing official ones soon.

[alteredworlds]

OK, thanks for the info!

Arduino 1.6.7 now seems to be working well for me (with board selection ‘BLE Nano(V1.5 32KB)’), after flashing the latest RedBear mk20 firmware from https://github.com/RedBearLab/nRF51822-Arduino https://github.com/RedBearLab/nRF51822-Arduino

(I had previously applied the firmware as documented at: https://developer.mbed.org/platforms/RedBearLab-BLE-Nano/ https://developer.mbed.org/platforms/RedBearLab-BLE-Nano/)

…so learning about this board can continue!

On 27 Jan 2016, at 09:32, Johnny Robeson notifications@github.com wrote:

NOTE: I haven't published my targets, because @AlessandroA https://github.com/AlessandroA said they will be publishing official ones soon.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #1371 (comment).

[ciarmcom]

ARM Internal Ref: IOTMORF-235

[hotchpotch]

hi.

• https://gist.github.com/hotchpotch/fe1d96ebabe3a46a41d5b5e9412811bd (Changed 16K to 32K)

My BLE Nano V1.5 worked on mbed OS5 this target.json.

However this target.json can't work BLE Nano V1.0...

[rkyymmt]

+1

[ghost]

GitHib issue review: Closed due to inactivity. Please re-file if critical issues found.