Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CMake: Refactor Silicon Laboratories targets #14279

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2021

Conversation

hugueskamba
Copy link
Collaborator

Refactor all Silicon Laboratories targets to be CMake buildsystem targets. This removes
the need for checking MBED_TARGET_LABELS repeatedly and allows us to be
more flexible in the way we include MBED_TARGET source in the build.

A side effect of this is it will allow us to support custom targets
without breaking the build for 'standard' targets, as we use CMake's
standard mechanism for adding build rules to the build system, rather
than implementing our own layer of logic to exclude files not needed for
the target being built. Using this approach, if an MBED_TARGET is not
linked to using target_link_libraries its source files will not be
added to the build. This means custom target source can be added to the
user's application CMakeLists.txt without polluting the build system
when trying to compile for a standard MBED_TARGET.

Summary of changes

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers


Refactor all Silicon Laboratories targets to be CMake buildsystem targets. This removes
the need for checking MBED_TARGET_LABELS repeatedly and allows us to be
more flexible in the way we include MBED_TARGET source in the build.

A side effect of this is it will allow us to support custom targets
without breaking the build for 'standard' targets, as we use CMake's
standard mechanism for adding build rules to the build system, rather
than implementing our own layer of logic to exclude files not needed for
the target being built. Using this approach, if an MBED_TARGET is not
linked to using `target_link_libraries` its source files will not be
added to the build. This means custom target source can be added to the
user's application CMakeLists.txt without polluting the build system
when trying to compile for a standard MBED_TARGET.
Copy link
Contributor

@rajkan01 rajkan01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mergify mergify bot added the needs: CI label Feb 12, 2021
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Feb 12, 2021

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Feb 12, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Feb 14, 2021
@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit 9d6a60c into ARMmbed:master Feb 14, 2021
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Feb 14, 2021
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.8.0 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Feb 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants