Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STM32WB: introduce STM32WB15CC NUCLEO #14746

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 10, 2021
Merged

Conversation

jeromecoutant
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary of changes

ST will promote a new NUCLEO board based on STM32WB15CC
https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32wb15cc.html

@ARMmbed/team-st-mcd

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation

See Readme info file for details


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

  • Tests done with baremetal for ARM and GCC

  • both CLI1 and CLI2 checked

    [] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
    [x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
    [] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR


Reviewers


@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Jun 8, 2021
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from a team June 8, 2021 13:30
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

ciarmcom commented Jun 8, 2021

@jeromecoutant, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

}
break;
default:
tr_error("StackType %u not expected\n", p_wireless_info->StackType);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just checking - two above are regular mbed error, the last one (default) is just trace error ?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right, I will align in some coming PR

thx

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels Jun 9, 2021
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Jun 9, 2021

I started CI

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Jun 9, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit aeaac0e into ARMmbed:master Jun 10, 2021
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Jun 10, 2021
@jeromecoutant jeromecoutant deleted the PR_WB15CC branch June 10, 2021 12:35
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.12.0 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Jun 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants