Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove get_item and set_item from pyrflx packages #783

Closed
jklmnn opened this issue Sep 28, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #785
Closed

Remove get_item and set_item from pyrflx packages #783

jklmnn opened this issue Sep 28, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #785
Assignees
Labels
pyrflx Related to pyrflx package (Legacy Python API)

Comments

@jklmnn
Copy link
Member

jklmnn commented Sep 28, 2021

Remove the get_item and set_item API from pyrflx packages. To support the iterator for the validation tool implement the iterator interface.

@jklmnn jklmnn created this issue from a note in RecordFlux 0.6 (To do) Sep 28, 2021
@jklmnn jklmnn self-assigned this Sep 28, 2021
@jklmnn jklmnn added the pyrflx Related to pyrflx package (Legacy Python API) label Sep 28, 2021
@jklmnn jklmnn moved this from To do to In progress in RecordFlux 0.6 Sep 28, 2021
jklmnn added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2021
jklmnn added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2021
jklmnn added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2021
jklmnn added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2021
jklmnn added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2021
jklmnn added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2021
jklmnn added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2021
@treiher treiher linked a pull request Sep 30, 2021 that will close this issue
@treiher treiher closed this as completed Sep 30, 2021
RecordFlux 0.6 automation moved this from In progress to Merged Sep 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pyrflx Related to pyrflx package (Legacy Python API)
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants