Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The product interface org.apache.jackrabbit.api.JackrabbitSession annotated with @ProviderType should not be implemented by custom code #3183

Closed
3 tasks
manuel-sanchez-vilt opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@manuel-sanchez-vilt
Copy link

Required Information

  • AEM Version, including Service Packs, Cumulative Fix Packs, etc: AEM 2023.7.12874.20230726T072051Z
  • ACS AEM Commons Version: adobe/consulting:acs-aem-commons-all:6.0.14
  • Reproducible on Latest? Don't know yet.

Expected Behavior

I should be able to launch a non-production code quality pipeline in Cloud Manager without getting critical bugs.

Actual Behavior

I launch the non-production code quality pipeline in Cloud Manager and I get the following critical bug:

File location: adobe/consulting:acs-aem-commons-all:6.0.14

Issue:
"The product interface org.apache.jackrabbit.api.JackrabbitSession annotated with @ProviderType should not be implemented by custom code. Detected in com.adobe.acs.commons.wrap.jackrabbit.JackrabbitSessionIWrap contained in /apps/acs-commons/install/acs-aem-commons-bundle-6.0.14.jar."

Documentation: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-cloud-manager/content/using/custom-code-quality-rules.html?lang=en#product-apis-annotated-with-providertype-should-not-be-implemented-or-extended-by-customers

Steps to Reproduce

Just create a code quality pipeline in Cloud Manager of a project that uses acs-commons and run it.

@GonzaloCalandria
Copy link

Please fix this! I've my pipeline stuck

adamcin added a commit to adamcin/acs-aem-commons that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2023
YegorKozlov pushed a commit to YegorKozlov/acs-aem-commons that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants