Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add saveMinecraft into the server status #127

Closed

Conversation

FxMorin
Copy link

@FxMorin FxMorin commented Jul 31, 2022

You should display a small icon next to servers that support this. So show that no chat report is used on the server, should be easy to add the icon with what ive done

Madis0 and others added 30 commits July 31, 2022 22:01
This massively speeds up sync times for me, since Loom no longer has to
remap 45+ Fabric API modules. Additionally, this allows users to install
No Chat Reports without Fabric API, as the required modules are already
included.
Added Finnish translation. // Lisätty suomenkielinen käännös.
private void onSerialize(ServerStatus serverStatus, Type type, JsonSerializationContext context,
CallbackInfoReturnable<JsonElement> info) {
if (!NoReportsConfig.includeQueryData()) return;
((JsonObject)info.getReturnValue()).addProperty("noChatReporting", NoReportsConfig.convertToGameMessage());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why have you decided to tie noChatReporting value to message conversion? NCR removes signatures both ways, conversion is just an optional alternative strategy for doing that.

Copy link
Member

@Aizistral Aizistral left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also there's still that bunch of conflicts to resolve. I hope it's not too much to ask from you to take care of them.

@Aizistral Aizistral self-requested a review August 22, 2022 03:24
Aizistral added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
@Aizistral Aizistral removed their request for review August 26, 2022 14:23
@Aizistral
Copy link
Member

Closed in favor of more clean and up-to-date implementation in #169.

@Aizistral Aizistral closed this Aug 26, 2022
Aizistral added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet