-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 261
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[AAE-7035] Being able to load a dynamic file location #7456
Conversation
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ | |||
export const ACTIVITI_CLOUD_APPS: any = { | |||
SUB_PROCESS_APP: { | |||
name: 'subprocessapp', | |||
file_location: 'https://github.com/Alfresco/alfresco-ng2-components/blob/develop/e2e/resources/activiti7/subprocessapp.zip?raw=true', | |||
file_location: (TAG = 'develop') => `https://github.com/Alfresco/alfresco-ng2-components/blob/${TAG}/e2e/resources/activiti7/subprocessapp.zip?raw=true`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Previously we were using it as a normal property, now as a function. How doesn't it cause any problem with other parts of the app without making changes even there?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this file is only used by init-aae-env command
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in this case: 🎖️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what a pleasure!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")
What is the current behaviour? (You can also link to an open issue here)
What is the new behaviour?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")
If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications: ...
Other information: