Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed NPE in Ofy DAO #299

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 1, 2013
Merged

Fixed NPE in Ofy DAO #299

merged 1 commit into from Aug 1, 2013

Conversation

Chris-V
Copy link
Member

@Chris-V Chris-V commented Aug 1, 2013

Quick fix for a NPE in the BaseDao. We should add a story for some end-to-end and unit tests for the crawler in our next iteration.

We should also update our hivecrawl instance...

@branflake2267
Copy link
Contributor

Nice job

@christiangoudreau
Copy link
Member

Well do it :D LGTM

Chris-V pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2013
@Chris-V Chris-V merged commit 8c233a4 into master Aug 1, 2013
@Chris-V Chris-V deleted the cv_crawler_fix_npe branch August 1, 2013 19:26

@Override
public Ofy begin() {
return new Ofy(OfyService.ofy());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

com.gwtplatform.crawlerservice.server.objectify.OfyService is not used anymore execpt for the static constructor

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should maybe remove it then

@christiangoudreau
Copy link
Member

@Chris-V did you updated hivecrawl?

@Chris-V
Copy link
Member Author

Chris-V commented Aug 13, 2013

No I'll do it this afternoon. I thought I just had view permissions.

Chris-V pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2014
hpehl pushed a commit to hpehl/GWTP that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants