Feature Request - Additional filter for parts table view to filter by part attribute

[Jegelewicz]

Issue Documentation is http://handbook.arctosdb.org/how_to/How-to-Use-Issues-in-Arctos.html

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

See #6760

Describe what you're trying to accomplish
A clear and concise overview of the goals; why are you asking for this?

Download the parts with a single attribute to eliminate the attributes appearing across multiple columns when I am only interested in a single part attribute.

Describe the solution you'd like
How might we accomplish your goals?

Add a filter to the parts table view that allows me to filter by part attribute type.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

See #6760

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Priority
Please assign a priority-label. Unprioritized issues gets sent into a black hole of despair.

[dustymc]

probably easy

Gonna be onem days, innit....

The part viewer-thing is using https://github.com/ArctosDB/PG_DDL/blob/master/function/getOrderedPartAttr.sql, which doesn't produce much opportunity for filtering (it's pulling the nth key-ordered attribute), and is returning only type/value/units.

Also not sure someone working with part attributes really needs to scroll past 21 columns of container-stuff to get where they need to be.

Is that form doing what everyone needs? (I'm hoping some sort of more-useful rebuild will result in something that's also more filter-able.)

[Jegelewicz]

OK - I hear you and I'm wondering if we just need a separate thing? GUID/part/attribute only (no dates, storage or other stuff). Based on the title - the existing form is doing loan stuff? How did the existing form get developed as is? Who asked for what and who is using it for what?

Isn't it always onem days?

[dustymc]

separate thing

Seems like it to me, but I don't use this stuff.

How

Evolution probably.

I think maybe a blank-slate issue encompassing

• this
• Feature Request - view or download part attributes #6386
• Make Parts Table Download consistent with Parts Table View #6709
• Feature Request - add parent/child relationships to part component loader #6363 (needs ID)
• whatever I missed

makes more sense than trying to do anything with what seems to be a bit of a mix-n-match prototype??

[dustymc]

merge-->#6806