Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[sort-imports] enforce sort-imports rule in identity-vscode #20110

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 9, 2022

Conversation

bzhang0
Copy link
Contributor

@bzhang0 bzhang0 commented Jan 28, 2022

This PR reinforces the changes made in #19068 by changing the subdirectory's linting rule to "sort-imports": "error".

This affects the directory under sdk/identity/identity-vscode.

@ghost ghost added Azure.Identity customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization. labels Jan 28, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 28, 2022

Thank you for your contribution bzhang0! We will review the pull request and get back to you soon.

@ghost ghost added the Impact++ This pull request was submitted by a member of the Impact++ team. label Jan 28, 2022
@check-enforcer
Copy link

check-enforcer bot commented Feb 9, 2022

This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer.

What is Check Enforcer?

Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass.

Why am I getting this message?

You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged.

What should I do now?

If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows:
/check-enforcer evaluate
Typically evaulation only takes a few seconds. If you know that your pull request is not covered by a pipeline and this is expected you can override Check Enforcer using the following command:
/check-enforcer override
Note that using the override command triggers alerts so that follow-up investigations can occur (PRs still need to be approved as normal).

What if I am onboarding a new service?

Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment:
/azp run prepare-pipelines
This will run a pipeline that analyzes the source tree and creates the pipelines necessary to build and validate your pull request. Once the pipeline has been created you can trigger the pipeline using the following comment:
/azp run js - [service] - ci

@jeremymeng jeremymeng merged commit 8f7fc22 into Azure:main Feb 9, 2022
azure-sdk pushed a commit to azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-js that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2022
[2022-04-01-preview] Add New Api-version for Microsoft.ApiManagement (Azure#20399)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.ApiManagement from version preview/2021-12-01-preview to version 2022-04-01-preview

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* APIM Auth Servers (Azure#19234)

* APIM Auth Servers

* adding x-ms-identifiers

* removing some weird, invisible special char

* formatting

* oAuth2AuthenticationSettings moved to AuthSettings

* Formatting

Co-authored-by: Milan Zolota <mizolota@microsoft.com>

* API Management Authorization Endpoints (Azure#19615)

* Add blockchain to latest profile

* Add additional types

* add authorizations definitions

* authorizations operations

* add examples

* update readme

* fix examples

* fix linter delete errors

* address CI validation errors

* prettier fix

* update to 2022-04

* fix readme

* Update specification/apimanagement/resource-manager/Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2022-04-01-preview/apimauthorizationproviders.json

Co-authored-by: Sean Kim <seaki@microsoft.com>

* update versions

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Mark Cowlishaw <markcowl@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Annaji Sharma Ganti <anganti@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Annaji Sharma Ganti <42851022+annaji-msft@users.noreply.github.com>

* Move Long running Create Operation from Location based to Azure-AsyncOperation Header (Azure#19733)

* azure-asyncOperation

* prettier

* fix(apim): Add missing 'metrics' property to diagnostics contract in 2022-04-01-preview (Azure#20317)

* apim /PUT apis import add translateRequiredQueryParameters (Azure#20333)

* [2022-04-01-preview] Replace resource with proxyresource and TrackedResource (Azure#20461)

* replace resource with proxyresource

* revert to proxyresource

* Add type object to authorization definitions (Azure#20631)

Authorization definitions were missing "type": "object", and this change adds that key/value pair

* Add type object to policy fragment definition (Azure#20585)

* APIM Open ID Connect providers (Azure#20622)

* APIM Open ID Connect providers

* added new proeprties for update

* prettier

* [APIM] Add Nat Gateway (Azure#19990)

* Update apimdeployment.json

* Create ApiManagementCreateServiceWithNatGatewayEnabled.json

* fix typo in file

* Change Nat Gateway property to enum

* modify type of natgateway state

* update property name

* add example reference

* small fix in example

* rename to  outboundPublicIPAddresses

Co-authored-by: Samir Solanki <samirsolanki@outlook.com>

* [2022-04-01-preview] MIgrate2Stv2 API (Azure#20504)

* migrate2stv2

* updated to post

* 202 and location

* add body to 202

* remove body from 202

Co-authored-by: Vatsa Patel <vatsapatel@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Samir Solanki <samirsolanki@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: vatsapatel@microsoft.colm <vatsapatel@microsoft.colm>

* Address Authorizations MissingTypeObject errors (Azure#20919)

* Add forgotten If-Match header (Azure#20920)

* Add forgotten If-Match header

`If-Match` header for the `DeleteAuthorizationAccessPolicy.json file` was forgotten. This change adds the wildcard character for the `If-Match` header for that file.

* Update ApiManagementDeleteAuthorization.json

* Use common types for specs and count as readonly (Azure#21023)

* common types

* count readonly

* Sasolank/more review comments (Azure#21025)

* XML

* proxy to gateway

* Update Authorizations Spec (Azure#21027)

* Update definitions.json

Update wording for PostGetLoginLink endpoint description

* Update apimauthorizationproviders.json

Add 201 response to all Authorization PUT requests

* Updated examples and fixed formatting

There was a formatting issue within apimauthorizationproviders.json, and the Authorization examples needed to be updated with the new 201 responses for creating/updating Authorization entities.

* Add long-running-operation key/value

Added x-ms-long-running-operation: true to Authorization PUT requests

* Remove long-running-operations

* readonly revert (Azure#21050)

* Set  SchemaContract.Document as required. (Azure#20110)

* Updated documentation of the SchemaContract. Server use to return code 500 in case SchemaContract.Document is null. That issue was fixed in the APIM and server will return proper response code.

* Fix AzureApiValidation

* update field with properties

* revert remaining readonly on collection (Azure#21051)

* Change to camel casing for "accesspolicies" (Azure#21070)

* Change to camel casing for "accesspolicies"

* More camel casing updates for access policies

* list example fixed (Azure#21089)

* fix definition (Azure#21110)

* upgrade to v3 for common types (Azure#21109)

* upgrade to v3

* Space

* revert to v2 proxyResource

Co-authored-by: Milan Zolota <Hardell@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Milan Zolota <mizolota@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean D Kim <seandkim14@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark Cowlishaw <markcowl@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Annaji Sharma Ganti <anganti@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Annaji Sharma Ganti <42851022+annaji-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tom Kerkhove <kerkhove.tom@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Korolev Dmitry <deagle.gross@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Logan Zipkes <44794089+LFZ96@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rafał Mielowski <mielex@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: malincrist <92857141+malincrist@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: GuanchenIntern <109827715+GuanchenIntern@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: VatsaPatel <vatsapatel13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vatsa Patel <vatsapatel@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: vatsapatel@microsoft.colm <vatsapatel@microsoft.colm>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Agapov <103097563+agapovm@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Azure.Identity customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization. Impact++ This pull request was submitted by a member of the Impact++ team.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants