Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azure-mgmt-security: remove duplicated named function argument #15760

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bluca
Copy link
Member

@bluca bluca commented Dec 11, 2020

File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/azure/mgmt/security/models/_models_py3.py, line 531
def init(
^
SyntaxError: duplicate argument 'is_enabled' in function definition

  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/azure/mgmt/security/models/_models_py3.py, line 531
    def __init__(
    ^
SyntaxError: duplicate argument 'is_enabled' in function definition
@bluca bluca closed this Dec 24, 2020
@bluca bluca deleted the duplicated_argument branch December 24, 2020 11:59
openapi-sdkautomation bot pushed a commit to AzureSDKAutomation/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2021
StoragePool GA Swagger Release (Azure#15760)

* initial from 2021-04-01-preview

* update version

* long running operations description

* list skus 1

* First pass -- added rest of the updates.

* Fix validation issues

* Updated README files

* Address team's comments

* Avocado errors

* Fix Lint diff errors

* Review feedback

* Updated sku fields level for resource sku api

* Fix lint errors

* Fix go readme

* Fixed go read me

* Update specification/storagepool/resource-manager/readme.go.md

Co-authored-by: Arcturus <dapzhang@microsoft.com>

Co-authored-by: ruyingchen <ruyingchen@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Harshitha Akkaraju <hakkaraj@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Arcturus <dapzhang@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant