ask for the replacement of BFO_0000178

[leonqli]

Dear BFO,

It seems BFO_0000178 is no longer existing now.

http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000178

Could you recommend a replacement for it? We used it for the relationship of a protein complex to protein.

Thanks,
Leon

[zhengj2007]

@leonqli Could you please let us know what the term with ID BFO_0000178, such as label?

[yongqunh]

See here: http://nmrml.org/cv/v1.0.rc1/doc/doc/objectproperties/BFO0000178___-324347506.html the term appears to be for: Object Property: 'has continuant part at some time' This term is not used any more probably due to some restriction it may result in. By name, it is appears to be a subproperty of the term ‘has part’ I would indeed suggest to use the term ‘has part’ to replace the BFO_0000178. Best, Oliver From: jie zheng <notifications@github.com> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 12:16 PM To: BFO-ontology/BFO <BFO@noreply.github.com> Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com> Subject: Re: [BFO-ontology/BFO] ask for the replacement of BFO_0000178 (#226) External Email - Use Caution @leonqli<https://github.com/leonqli> Could you please let us know what the term with ID BFO_0000178, such as label? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#226?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABD22Q63FZK3I6KTRT6DBWDRFFBGVA5CNFSM4K5UE6I2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOENJI5MQ#issuecomment-592613042>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABD22QZ7C67PBPTF2XJH4QDRFFBGVANCNFSM4K5UE6IQ>. ********************************************************** Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues

[leonqli]

@leonqli Could you please let us know what the term with ID BFO_0000178, such as label?
Thanks @zhengj2007, it is 'has continuant part at some time'

[zhengj2007]

@leonqli The official release of BFO 2.0 is classes-only version and does not contain any relations. But you can use previous version of BFO, which is:
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo/2014-05-03/bfo.owl

[leonqli]

thank you very much! @zhengj2007

[johnbeve]

This thread seems to have been resolved.