feature: refactor get the snippet code

[NguyenTuanCanh]

Changes made:

1. Removed unnecessary nested promises by chaining then() calls.
2. Used forEach loop instead of for loop for iterating over codeLines.
3. Replaced indexOf with includes for checking if a line contains the search term.
4. Simplified the logic for setting startingLine and foundLine within the loop.
5. Replaced arrow functions with concise arrow functions where possible.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
documentation	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 5, 2024 9:57am

[yedpodtrzitko]

would this work?

Suggested change

	.then(response => response.text())
	.then(text => {
	const parsed = JSON.parse(JSON.parse(text).jsonPayload);
	.then(response => response.json())
	.then(jsonData => {
	const parsed = JSON.parse(jsonData.jsonPayload);

[NguyenTuanCanh]

@yedpodtrzitko I think keeping my version will work fine. As for yours, I'm not sure.

[sebavan]

We should try as it is better ? can you check @NguyenTuanCanh ?

[RaananW]

Both should work, one needs one less JSON.parse call.

[sebavan]

Without the break, the code might not early exit anymore, why this change ?

[NguyenTuanCanh]

@sebavan Wow, thank you for your question. Updated!

[sebavan]

Your version is still different as foundLine will not be set outside of the condition but was always set in the loop version. I would in this case recommend to keep the loop as there is no reasons not too ?

[RaananW]

This is mainly a cosmetic change, right? No functionality has changed?

[RaananW]

I am a bit confused as to the current changes. Formatting has changed a bit, but it seems like the code as it is is almost (or even completely) the same?

[RaananW]

any update here? or should I close it?