Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DMT doesn't work w/compressed MN privkeys #1

Closed
nmarley opened this issue Oct 25, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

DMT doesn't work w/compressed MN privkeys #1

nmarley opened this issue Oct 25, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@nmarley
Copy link

nmarley commented Oct 25, 2017

No description provided.

@Bertrand256
Copy link
Owner

DMT doesn't enforce (un)compression of MN privkey that the user provides, but to my knowledge, the Dash network requires that the key is uncompressed. I didn't checked that, but you'll probably get an error message as a result of sending to the network "Start masternode" message using a compressed key.

@nmarley
Copy link
Author

nmarley commented Oct 25, 2017

I am normally able to use compressed keys (starting with X) from the Dash-QT client. But yesterday my DMT/Trezor kept giving an error 'til I switched to an uncompressed one.

@Bertrand256
Copy link
Owner

I will investigate it. Can you give me some details: what DMT feature you used (voting or starting masternode) and what was the error message? Thanks.

@nmarley
Copy link
Author

nmarley commented Dec 25, 2017

It is starting the masternode, and the error message I receive is this:

Failed to start masternode.

Response from Dash daemon: Masternode broadcast signature verification failed.

It only happens using compressed keys. Uncompressed keys beginning with 7 work fine.

@Bertrand256
Copy link
Owner

Thanks @nmarley. I'll look at it after implementing testnet support in the tool.

Bertrand256 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2018
@Bertrand256
Copy link
Owner

Compressed keys are working now - verified with dashd v12.3 on testnet.

Bertrand256 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 5, 2019
@itsmorelove itsmorelove mentioned this issue Oct 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants