We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BioSequences.jl/src/bioseq/site_counting/site_counting.jl
Line 158 in 45e5533
@bicycle1885 There was an issue or PR recently in which you recommended removing Varargs and just going with a general iterable.
I'm considering whether I should change the varargs in the signature to some other container type, perhaps add a parameter for AbstractArray like:
count_pairwise{P<:Position,A<:NucAlphs,C<:AbstractArray}(::Type{P}, seqs::C{BioSequence{A},N})
I already have a plan to cleanup the fast counting internals a bit and wondered if it was worth doing this at the same time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
BioSequences.jl/src/bioseq/site_counting/site_counting.jl
Line 158 in 45e5533
@bicycle1885 There was an issue or PR recently in which you recommended removing Varargs and just going with a general iterable.
I'm considering whether I should change the varargs in the signature to some other container type, perhaps add a parameter for AbstractArray like:
I already have a plan to cleanup the fast counting internals a bit and wondered if it was worth doing this at the same time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: