Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(inactive) Optimal p-value weighting with independent information (data and simulations) #396

Closed
mshasan opened this issue Jun 9, 2017 · 27 comments
Assignees
Labels
3b. declined not appropriate for Bioconductor ERROR VERSION BUMP REQUIRED

Comments

@mshasan
Copy link

mshasan commented Jun 9, 2017

Update the following URL to point to the GitHub repository of
the package you wish to submit to Bioconductor

Confirm the following by editing each check box to '[x]'

  • [ x] I understand that by submitting my package to Bioconductor,
    the package source and all review commentary are visible to the
    general public.

  • [ x] I have read the Bioconductor Package Submission
    instructions. My package is consistent with the Bioconductor
    Package Guidelines.

  • [x ] I understand that a minimum requirement for package acceptance
    is to pass R CMD check and R CMD BiocCheck with no ERROR or WARNINGS.
    Passing these checks does not result in automatic acceptance. The
    package will then undergo a formal review and recommendations for
    acceptance regarding other Bioconductor standards will be addressed.

  • [x ] My package addresses statistical or bioinformatic issues related
    to the analysis and comprehension of high throughput genomic data.

  • [ x] I am committed to the long-term maintenance of my package. This
    includes monitoring the support site for issues that users may
    have, subscribing to the bioc-devel mailing list to stay aware
    of developments in the Bioconductor community, responding promptly
    to requests for updates from the Core team in response to changes in
    R or underlying software.

I am familiar with the essential aspects of Bioconductor software
management, including:

  • [x ] The 'devel' branch for new packages and features.
  • [ x] The stable 'release' branch, made available every six
    months, for bug fixes.
  • [ x] Bioconductor version control using Subversion
    (optionally via GitHub).

For help with submitting your package, please subscribe and post questions
to the bioc-devel mailing list.

@bioc-issue-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @mshasan

Thanks for submitting your package. We are taking a quick
look at it and you will hear back from us soon.

The DESCRIPTION file for this package is:

Package: OPWpaper
Type: Package
Title: Reproduce figures and simulations of OPWeight
Version: 0.99.0
Date: 2017-04-18
Author: Mohamad S. Hasan
Maintainer: Mohamad S. Hasan <shakilmohamad7@gmail.com>
Description: To produce the figures and the simulations results, an extensive simulations
  has been conducted in the paper Hasan and Schliekelman (2017). In this
  package, we wraps the functions needed to reproduce the figures 
   and the simulations results described in the paper. We also showed 
   real life examples.
Depends: 
    R (>= 3.3.0),
    OPWeight
License: Artistic-2.0
LazyData: true
Imports:
    cowplot,
    ggplot2,
    IHW,
    mvnfast,
    qvalue,
    reshape2,
    stats,
    tibble
Suggests:
    BiocStyle,
    DESeq2,
    devtools,
    gridExtra,
    knitr,
    rmarkdown,
VignetteBuilder: knitr
biocViews:
    MultipleComparison,
    RNASeq
RoxygenNote: 6.0.1
URL: https://github.com/mshasan/OPWpapaer
Bugreports: https://github.com/mshasan/OPWpaper/issues

@mtmorgan
Copy link
Contributor

mtmorgan commented Jun 9, 2017

I don't think this package is appropriate for Bioconductor. It seems from the Description like it is designed for 'reproducible research' rather than software that implements functions that are useful across different analyses. It doesn't have a vignette, which is a really central aspect of reproducible research and requirement for Bioconductor packages. The package contains functions that implement possibly useful calculations, but the interface to these functions is ad hoc and not amenable to reuse or interoperability across Bioconductor work flows.

I also don't understand the relationship between this package and your earlier submission. Please elaborate.

@mshasan
Copy link
Author

mshasan commented Jun 9, 2017

@mtmorgan Actually, when I was reading the instructions about linking webhook that was sent to me earlier, I found that I can add additional packages which are related to the previous package "OPWeight". That's why I added. I have not written the vignettes yet probably by this weekend I will be able to finish developing the vignettes. It was my misunderstanding.

Regarding the relevance of this package to Bioconductor, there are four functions that are reusable and others are helpful if one wants to conduct simulations, especially using my method. In this packages, I essentially demonstrated how to apply the method I developed via simulations and data. I hope that will be more clear once I updated the vignettes.

Thank you

@mtmorgan
Copy link
Contributor

mtmorgan commented Jun 9, 2017

Why are the functions in this package not included in the earlier submission?

@mshasan
Copy link
Author

mshasan commented Jun 9, 2017

Because in the previous package, I solely showed the method that I developed, but in the later one I showed a comparative study between several methods. For your convenience, I can referee two Bioconductor packages "IHW" and "IHWpaper". In the first, the author showed his method and in the second he showed comparative study results. My two packages would be similar.

@mtmorgan
Copy link
Contributor

mtmorgan commented Jun 9, 2017

So it seems like the main problem here is that your package is missing the central piece -- the vignette?

@mtmorgan
Copy link
Contributor

mtmorgan commented Jun 9, 2017

I closed this issue. Reopen it with a note to @mtmorgan when your package is complete.

@mtmorgan mtmorgan closed this as completed Jun 9, 2017
@mtmorgan
Copy link
Contributor

mtmorgan commented Jun 9, 2017

Please also make sure that has biocViews terms from the ExperimentData ontology.

@mshasan
Copy link
Author

mshasan commented Jun 11, 2017

@mtmorgan package is now complete

@mshasan
Copy link
Author

mshasan commented Jun 13, 2017

@mtmorgan I am wondering whether do I need to open a new issue for this package or will you update the existing issue?

@mtmorgan mtmorgan reopened this Jun 13, 2017
@bioc-issue-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Your package has been approved for building. Your package is
now submitted to our queue.

IMPORTANT: Please read the instructions for setting
up a push hook on your repository, or further changes to your
repository will NOT trigger a new build.

@bioc-issue-bot bioc-issue-bot added 2. review in progress assign a reviewer and a more thorough review of package code and documentation taking place and removed 1. awaiting moderation labels Jun 13, 2017
@bioc-issue-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "skipped, ERROR".
This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix.
Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the following build report for more details:

http://bioconductor.org/spb_reports/OPWpaper_buildreport_20170613115736.html

@mshasan
Copy link
Author

mshasan commented Jun 13, 2017

@lshep This package is an additional package depending on another package "OPWeight", which is currently under review by Bioconductor. That's why it is producing the error.

@lshep
Copy link
Contributor

lshep commented Jun 14, 2017

@mshasan I am away on vacation this week but will review when I am back. Keep in mind, we will not accept this package until the dependent OPWeight is accepted, esp since we will not be able to have a full build report until OPWeight is available. In the meantime, as OPWeight gets reviewed, please apply any similar changes that may be suggested as far as coding standards and syntax in OPWeight to OPWpaper. I will provide a more detailed review of the package when I get back.

@bioc-issue-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

7eb3bb8 Update DESCRIPTION

@bioc-issue-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "ERROR".
This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix.
Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the following build report for more details:

http://bioconductor.org/spb_reports/OPWpaper_buildreport_20170623060340.html

@vobencha
Copy link

Hi @mshasan,
We have reassigned both your data and software packages to me so one person can review both.
For starters, please address these issues in the Single Package Builder output:

  1. non-portable paths
* checking for portable file names ... NOTE
Found the following non-portable file paths:
  OPWpaper/vignettes/FWER_and_FDR_cache/html/fdr_ey_notequals_et2_9404802ef1bebe4fd4a29a160e5426f5.RData
  OPWpaper/vignettes/FWER_and_FDR_cache/html/fdr_ey_notequals_et_f14ecd09d311ed64884791527da9b689.RData
  OPWpaper/vignettes/FWER_and_FDR_cache/html/fwer_ey_notequals_et2_66785310a27dacda55b0b87bdf4b790d.RData
...
  1. reduce example runtime
* checking examples ... [108s/111s] OK
Examples with CPU or elapsed time > 5s
                              user system elapsed
probRel_filterVstest_effect 77.466  0.495  80.136
simu_fwer                   19.468  0.252  20.472
  1. use TRUE and FALSE
* Checking for T...
    Found T in R/weight_byEffect_cont.R (line 79, column 46)
    * WARNING: Use TRUE instead of T (found in 1 files)
* Checking for F...
    Found F in vignettes/Power.Rmd
    * WARNING: Use FALSE instead of F (found in 1 files)
  1. man pages need non-empty \value and run-able examples
* Checking man pages...
    * WARNING: Add non-empty \value sections to the following man
      pages: man/weightSum_by_c.Rd
* Checking exported objects have runnable examples...
    * ERROR: At least 80% of man pages documenting exported objects
      must have runnable examples. The following pages do not:
      nice_plots.Rd, prob_weight_plots.Rd, ranksProb_compare_plots.Rd,
  ranksProb_compare.Rd

When you've made the changes please bump the version to 0.99.2 and resubmit. Once these preliminary errors are cleaned up I'll do a full review.
Thanks.
Valerie

@bioc-issue-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are:

20ff93d version bumped

@bioc-issue-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.

On one or more platforms, the build results were: "skipped, ERROR".
This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix.
Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.

Please see the following build report for more details:

http://bioconductor.org/spb_reports/OPWpaper_buildreport_20170716173224.html

@mshasan
Copy link
Author

mshasan commented Jul 22, 2017

@vobencha I addressed your comments and fixed the problems. I still have one problem related to the vignette. Would you be able to look at my vignette code, especially the first few lines where I used "load()" to load .RDATA. I tried many different ways but could not figure out the problems. My vignette code passed R CMD check but does not pass in the Bioconductor system. It seems that Bioconductor system is unable to load my saved data from the repository.

@vobencha
Copy link

I'll take a look at this tomorrow.
Valerie

@vobencha
Copy link

Hi,
When you use load() the file type must be saved using save() and must be location in the data/ directory of the package.

I believe this is being submitted as a data package so we need to get it in the correct format. Data packages have a slightly different structure than software. Here are some examples that you can download and look at the source code:
http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/BiocViews.html#___ExperimentData

Please re-org the package so it has these directories and files:
R/
tests/
man/
vignettes/
data/: All .rds files go here
inst/extdata/: All non-.rds files go here
external_data_store.txt: This file states where the data files are. For example, here is what the file looks like in the minfiData package:

~/minfiData >cat external_data_store.txt 
data
inst/extdata

Valerie

@vobencha
Copy link

fyi I'm out of the office July 26 - Aug 2.
Valerie

@vobencha
Copy link

Checking in. Are you planning to submit a new version of this data package?
Valerie

@mshasan
Copy link
Author

mshasan commented Aug 14, 2017

@vobencha Thank you for the reminder. Yes, I will modify the package. I am currently writing my Ph.D. dissertation, therefore, struggling finding time.

@vobencha
Copy link

Should we close this issue and you can re-submit when you're ready? There is no rush to add the data package.

@mshasan
Copy link
Author

mshasan commented Aug 24, 2017 via email

@vobencha vobencha added the 3b. declined not appropriate for Bioconductor label Aug 24, 2017
@bioc-issue-bot bioc-issue-bot changed the title Optimal p-value weighting with independent information (data and simulations) (inactive) Optimal p-value weighting with independent information (data and simulations) Aug 24, 2017
@vobencha vobencha removed the 2. review in progress assign a reviewer and a more thorough review of package code and documentation taking place label Aug 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3b. declined not appropriate for Bioconductor ERROR VERSION BUMP REQUIRED
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants